By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Eurogamer: COD: Advanced Warfare's campaign runs more smoothly on XB1 than on PS4

walsufnir on 04 November 2014
kowenicki said:

Who cares? I repeat, this over analysis of technical aspects has the potential to be more harmful than good.

What's more its so effin dull.

I'm consistent.


Funny how opinions flip back and forth with "I see a difference" to "I can't feel a framedrop to 50" and so on, fitting to situations where the favorite system could "win", whatever that means in this context. In the end, all of this is totally subjective, although resolution and fps is objectively measurable.



Around the Network
DirtyP2002 on 04 November 2014

Don't worry guys, ethomaz is controlling the situation!

Seriously, the resolution shit is probably the cancer of this gen.



Imagine not having GamePass on your console...

LudicrousSpeed on 04 November 2014
ethomaz said:

LudicrousSpeed said:

Its well documented why they chose the engine and resolution they did. Anyway this isn't a Titanfall thread. If you guys wanna talk Titanfall with me then do it in a TF thread please.

It is because you are showing double standards... Titanfall framerate was worst than PS4 AW... so they could choose 720p to have a solid 60fps... if you compain about the PS4 AW then you need to complain about Titanfall because it is a worste case.

I hope you have someone standing under you with a net in case you fall while making that gargantuan reach. If you can show me a version of the game Respawn released that has a lower resolution than 792p and has a solid 60fps frame rate then I will concede you were right for once. Otherwise, please drop it. What you're doing with this 720p comment is reductio ad absurdum nonsense and it won't be taken seriously. My position is very simple, no reason for you to be confused here.



DonFerrari on 04 November 2014

Very balanced. Maybe with some patching ps4 can get smoothier fps and X1 less tearing mas crushing. But it seems like locked 60fps and good pixels will please cod players.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

bananaking21 on 04 November 2014
GProgrammer said:
LudicrousSpeed said:

I said I don't want developers sacrificing FPS for resolution. 

When you find something about Respawn sacrificing FPS for resolution, let me know.

OK I'll let you know now,

Heres Titanfall sub 20 FPS on Xbox one from the digital foundry article,

 Respawn should of gone with 600p instead of 792p perhaps then they could get the framerate up over 50FPS.

Titanfall game of the Year, where framerate is king 


and then he dares speaks about hypocrisy. i didnt have to search much to find it.

 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6778838



Around the Network
michael_stutzer on 04 November 2014
dane007 said:
Analyzestuff said:
Just the Campaign right?
Hm these are like 2-3 hours usually in Call of Duty.

As of now we know this

XBO:

-constant 60 fps
-variable resolution
-black crush
-screen tearing


PS4:

-full 1080p
-no screen tearing
-no crushed blacks
-fairly constant 60 fps (locked in MP)


Seems to me the PS4 Version is still superior especially cause of the locked 60fps in Multiplayer by 1080p native.

theres no  crush blacks as xo version. and screen tearing is rare according df. i have yet to see any screen tearing


There is crushed blacks there. How can you not see it is beyond me.



Cobretti2 on 04 November 2014
ethomaz said:

LudicrousSpeed said:

Its well documented why they chose the engine and resolution they did. Anyway this isn't a Titanfall thread. If you guys wanna talk Titanfall with me then do it in a TF thread please.

It is because you are showing double standards... Titanfall framerate was worst than PS4 AW... so they could choose 720p to have a solid 60fps... if you compain about the PS4 AW then you need to complain about Titanfall because it is a worste case.


get a PC if resolution bothers you this much. Devs will never optimise their games on consoles unless they are exclusives.



 

 

Scientificreason on 04 November 2014
LudicrousSpeed said:
Sad to see any developer focusing on something irrelevant to gameplay like resolution at the expense of something crucial to gameplay like frame rate. Especially a CoD developer. Maybe it can be fixed in a patch.

Never even read the article.... It's only the first chapter after the latest patch.  The rest of the campaign is locked 60. It's perfecrly fine.  Ps4 is the best version.  MP is Also fine. 



dane007 on 04 November 2014
michael_stutzer said:
dane007 said:
Analyzestuff said:
Just the Campaign right?
Hm these are like 2-3 hours usually in Call of Duty.

As of now we know this

XBO:

-constant 60 fps
-variable resolution
-black crush
-screen tearing


PS4:

-full 1080p
-no screen tearing
-no crushed blacks
-fairly constant 60 fps (locked in MP)


Seems to me the PS4 Version is still superior especially cause of the locked 60fps in Multiplayer by 1080p native.

theres no  crush blacks as xo version. and screen tearing is rare according df. i have yet to see any screen tearing


There is crushed blacks there. How can you not see it is beyond me.


show me a pic of a crush black in COD. I just don't see it. i don't spend my time to look for visual blemishes. for me its not obvious



Scientificreason on 04 November 2014
dane007 said:
michael_stutzer said:
dane007 said:
Analyzestuff said:
Just the Campaign right?
Hm these are like 2-3 hours usually in Call of Duty.

As of now we know this

XBO:

-constant 60 fps
-variable resolution
-black crush
-screen tearing


PS4:

-full 1080p
-no screen tearing
-no crushed blacks
-fairly constant 60 fps (locked in MP)


Seems to me the PS4 Version is still superior especially cause of the locked 60fps in Multiplayer by 1080p native.

theres no  crush blacks as xo version. and screen tearing is rare according df. i have yet to see any screen tearing


There is crushed blacks there. How can you not see it is beyond me.


show me a pic of a crush black in COD. I just don't see it. i don't spend my time to look for visual blemishes. for me its not obvious

You will just say you don't see them anyways.  They are there whether you want to or not.  It is a common issue with x1 games.  It's a hot topic on nroff.