axumblade said:
Are there really people? |
^This lol. So much this.
Choose | |||
I believe it. | 109 | 45.80% | |
Conspiracy crap! | 128 | 53.78% | |
Total: | 237 |
axumblade said:
Are there really people? |
^This lol. So much this.
I'm no physicist or engineer either but we have no street level shots, and 7 had a trapezoidal footprint, most of what I have seen in the way of demolition footage is of square or rectangular footprinted buildings being dropped. I would think different shapes would behave differently.
As I thought the building also sat atop the "power station"
"The building was situated above a Consolidated Edison power substation, which imposed unique structural design constraints." So if the diesel was in a basement or subbasement footage taken even at street level (especially blocks away) likely wouldn't indicate what was happening below ground.
mii-gamer said: These comments are hilarious |
I know right? I needed a good laugh.
The_Yoda said: Does anyone know exactly where these generators and fuel were located inside building 7? Seems like oxygen rich air lines would be a perfect conduit for fire and you would have to have fuel on hand to run the generators. If these blew around one of the central supports in say the basement could it not result in the same demolition like effect? Just a theory. |
sounds interesting
i'll post what some of the main anomalies reported by engineers were
the way the building collapses in the middle first is characteristic of a controlled event
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=972ETepp4GI
this is done in order to cause the weight of the building to act inward as it falls
and its highly unlikely for this to happen in a random event
edit: found a video of an implosion with a kink effect that is pretty similar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qyYZe-R3p4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nco5hmi3OmU
the speed at which the building falls and how uniformly it falls
looking at footage the building falls in such a way that it appears as if all support for the building is eliminated instantly
it doesn't collapse in pieces or fall apart in pieces... the whole thing falls in a regular way straight down in a few seconds
again this is basically impossible for a random event
now i paraphrased of course but these were the most glaring issues with building 7 i believe
the thing about a fire theory is one thing i'd ask is why can we see no flames or smoke from the outside?
there may be some explanation for this but i don't know
but again i'm not an engineer so my opinion is no better than any other layman
CosmicSex said:
^This lol. So much this. |
I don't really understand this "are there really people" joke
In looking through some of your links I did see fire. Yes though it did drop rather prettily. I'd be more likely to believe (in the instance of just that building in the complex) that if it was dropped like that on purpose I could see insurance fraud being the motivation. Destroy your building without really being liable for too much property damage around it. Just spitballin'.
@ padib about halfway through the video (started watching the first time the link was posted) and already seeing holes in it ...
The_Yoda said: In looking through some of your links I did see fire. Yes though it did drop rather prettily. I'd be more likely to believe (in the instance of just that building in the complex) that if it was dropped like that on purpose I could see insurance fraud being the motivation. Destroy your building without really being liable for too much property damage around it. Just spitballin'. |
what do you think of these videos when compared back to the couple building 7 ones
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qyYZe-R3p4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nco5hmi3OmU
building 7
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=972ETepp4GI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWorDrTC0Qg
if you ask me it looks the same
Looks similar to me too although looking at your links the controlled ones collapse less uniformly than 7. They go from the inward out not all at once.
The_Yoda said: Looks similar to me too although looking at your links the controlled ones collapse less uniformly than 7. They go from the inward out not all at once. |
thats true may have to do with structural differences i guess