ClassicGamingWizzz said:
prinz_valium said:
ClassicGamingWizzz said: why is people crying about the scores ? do you take the gamespot review seriously ? lmao first - its gamespot, they do it for the clicks second - the dude who review it ? dude probably dont like or play these types of games, its like they said " we have this shit here to review who is not busy? oh kevin its free , the dude who only likes rpgs , give that review to him" result a 5 / 10 its boring :D The only reviews i care are gametrailers , IGN and gameinformer, they all liked it, in fact the dude who gave it the best score ( from gametrailers ) is a HUGE racing fan and one of the best reviwers in the industry |
no, but the score
playstation universe gave it an 95/100
so we need the gamespot 5/10 score to get a reliable picture
that result in 72,5/100 and is where the game belongs
|
did you played the game to say 72 is the score it deserves ?
|
no. but i read and saw a LOT of the game
thats enough for a personal opinion. im not getting payed for doing reviews. so i dont have to play a game to judge it.
thats just a dead argument. sure its better to play a game and maybe that can revise ur thought on the game. but its not necessary to make urself a picture of an product.
i would even downgade the score 10 point just because this game got delyed 1 year and is not even finished right now (weather patch)
low 70 is where it belongs on metacritics.
if u ask me about my opionion, it would give it a 65.
and after i played the game (btw i will, because a friend of mine get the game) il possibly rate it up to 75
and now u see. reviews and opinions are subjetive. nothing wrong with that