By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ClassicGamingWizzz said:
prinz_valium said:
ClassicGamingWizzz said:
why is people crying about the scores ? do you take the gamespot review seriously ? lmao

first - its gamespot, they do it for the clicks
second - the dude who review it ? dude probably dont like or play these types of games, its like they said " we have this shit here to review who is not busy? oh kevin its free , the dude who only likes rpgs , give that review to him" result a 5 / 10 its boring :D

The only reviews i care are gametrailers , IGN and gameinformer, they all liked it, in fact the dude who gave it the best score ( from gametrailers ) is a HUGE racing fan and one of the best reviwers in the industry


no, but the score

 

playstation universe gave it an 95/100

so we need the gamespot 5/10 score to get a reliable picture

 

that result in 72,5/100 and is where the game belongs

did you played the game to say 72 is the score it deserves ?

no. but i read and saw a LOT of the game

thats enough for a personal opinion. im not getting payed for doing reviews. so i dont have to play a game to judge it.

thats just a dead argument. sure its better to play a game and maybe that can revise ur thought on the game. but its not necessary to make urself a picture of an product.

 

i would even downgade the score 10 point just because this game got delyed 1 year and is not even finished right now (weather patch)

 

low 70 is where it belongs on metacritics.

if u ask me about my opionion, it would give it a 65.

and after i played the game (btw i will, because a friend of mine get the game) il possibly rate it up to 75

 

 

 

and now u see. reviews and opinions are subjetive. nothing wrong with that