By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Assassin's Creed Unity is 900p/30fps on both PS4 & Xbox One 'to avoid all the debates and stuff'

Neodegenerate said:
QuintonMcLeod said:


Just give up, dude. You're being silly.

I'm being silly because you can't find the item to defend your claim based on the parameters of what the general casual audience (the main audience) for video games would be interested in purchasing and dealing with?  Cool.  Glad to see your definition of silly.

Casual audience regularly swaps out HDD's in their consoles, they're capable of swapping out a GPU, they're on par for difficulty/complexity.



Around the Network
mornelithe said:
Neodegenerate said:
QuintonMcLeod said:


Just give up, dude. You're being silly.

I'm being silly because you can't find the item to defend your claim based on the parameters of what the general casual audience (the main audience) for video games would be interested in purchasing and dealing with?  Cool.  Glad to see your definition of silly.

Casual audience regularly swaps out HDD's in their consoles, they're capable of swapping out a GPU, they're on par for difficulty/complexity.

Do you have any stats to back up that claim?  I sincerely doubt that the casual audience is regularly swapping out their hard drives.  On the 360 where it was a click-in on the side of the system sure.  On anything that they have to go in though, generally people aren't willing to do that.



QuintonMcLeod said:

1) The PC I showed you out performs the PS4. That was the point

 

2) Yes, it can. Remember, it's the 265X not the 260 that you're probably looking at.


1) Not it doesn't. The GPU is pretty much equal and you will put a heavy abstraction layers with DX and the whole Windows OS. You will have 2GB of VRAM while the console can pretty much reserve 3 or 4GB with the current RAM reserves it has. The only point here is that you don't have a clue of what you are talking about and that's the only point where getting here. You are trying to outperform a console with a GPU that is basically equal just to prove you flawed price point argument.

2) It's the 265x, it's on the title of the link I posted. Try to read it, or if you did simply read it again.



the-pi-guy said:
QuintonMcLeod said:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYG-7T2LVDc

It's the devs fault in that case.  PS4 should be 900p60 from the specs.  


So, you show a game that's poorly optimized and runs like crap on the PC? Now you're just grasping for straws. You might as well just give up now.



Neodegenerate said:
mornelithe said:

Casual audience regularly swaps out HDD's in their consoles, they're capable of swapping out a GPU, they're on par for difficulty/complexity.

Do you have any stats to back up that claim?  I sincerely doubt that the casual audience is regularly swapping out their hard drives.  On the 360 where it was a click-in on the side of the system sure.  On anything that they have to go in though, generally people aren't willing to do that.

Yeah, I've done both. Swapping out the PS3 HDD actually required removing more screws than is necessary with a GPU.



Around the Network
torok said:
QuintonMcLeod said:
 

1) The PC I showed you out performs the PS4. That was the point

 

2) Yes, it can. Remember, it's the 265X not the 260 that you're probably looking at.


1) Not it doesn't. The GPU is pretty much equal and you will put a heavy abstraction layers with DX and the whole Windows OS. You will have 2GB of VRAM while the console can pretty much reserve 3 or 4GB with the current RAM reserves it has. The only point here is that you don't have a clue of what you are talking about and that's the only point where getting here. You are trying to outperform a console with a GPU that is basically equal just to prove you flawed price point argument.

2) It's the 265x, it's on the title of the link I posted. Try to read it, or if you did simply read it again.

I've provided links. Just go back and check them out.



mornelithe said:
Neodegenerate said:
mornelithe said:

Casual audience regularly swaps out HDD's in their consoles, they're capable of swapping out a GPU, they're on par for difficulty/complexity.

Do you have any stats to back up that claim?  I sincerely doubt that the casual audience is regularly swapping out their hard drives.  On the 360 where it was a click-in on the side of the system sure.  On anything that they have to go in though, generally people aren't willing to do that.

Yeah, I've done both. Swapping out the PS3 HDD actually required removing more screws than is necessary with a GPU.

That doesn't prove that the majority of people buying consoles are doing so though.  That just proves that you have done so.



Oh, the fun that this thread continues to give. It's like Christmas every time I come back!

OT:
This is still nothing to make a big deal out of...



It is near the end of the end....

This is rapidly moving towards most epic off topic thread this year.



Neodegenerate said:

That doesn't prove that the majority of people buying consoles are doing so though.  That just proves that you have done so.

I said regularly, I didn't say the majority.  Given the volume of articles, comments etc... throughout the PS3's gen, it was a popular option.  As far as specific numbers, couldn't tell ya, and don't really care, it's easy, so is swapping out a GPU.  Less than ~10 minute operation.