SubiyaCryolite said: Lame! PC version it is, unless they lock that too. |
Maybe they will to avoid all the debates and stuf.
SubiyaCryolite said: Lame! PC version it is, unless they lock that too. |
Maybe they will to avoid all the debates and stuf.
DakonBlackblade said:
Maybe they will to avoid all the debates and stuf. |
Ha ha ha.
super6646 said:
Those are just one of my statements, and how is that a bad thing, you thing robot like AI and crappy textures but 1080p is good, than thats your opinion, but definently not mine. |
It is a bad thing because at that resolution all you see will be jaggies. If anything at 720p it is better to have shorter draw distances.
AI has almost nothing to do with the resolution. One of them is CPU related while the other one depends on the GPU. Unless you do GPGPU, and none of the consoles do. PS4 is also much better suited to GPGPU processing.
vivster said:
Don't think this has anything to do with NVidia. If anything with Intel :P I believe the devs when they are saying that the game is very CPU heavy. All previous AC games were too. But this time they overdid it. I'm pretty sure if they reduced the number of people in the world there would be no parity since the CPU resources would be free to feed the GPUs and there would be a natural gap between the graphics again. |
the CPU cant be the problem, it will run on an allmost 8 years old intel without problem. its not that demanding if u compare it with other PC games that realy need the cpu power.
and it has nvidia exclusiv graphic features and ubi is working close with nvidia.
and ubi knows that they can get away with poor amd performance, because they dont care if u buy it on xbox or ps(it might benefits em if they sale the game on xbox, could be hat m$ is taking a smaller share of the price than sony)
they will bundle it with nvidia cards like the last one and sale a shitloa of copys to nvidia for that promotion deal...
dahuman said:
|
There is no parity with PCs and consoles, PC graphics are unlocked to as powerfull as your hardware is. Exclusive PC games look ages better than consoles games, so Im not quite sure what youre on about.
wary-wallaroo said: As someone who was hyped for this game, what a bunch of BS. I'll buy this second hand because Parity is a bunch of BS. Holding back the PS4 just because MS put out an underpowered machine is in no way reasonable. I'd rather my money go to Gamestop. |
Both the machines are well and truly underpowered.
If specs matter enormously just buy it for PC!
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS
DakonBlackblade said:
Maybe they will to avoid all the debates and stuf. |
Ubisoft did LOCK the ultra-textures on Watch Dogs.......
starcraft said:
Both the machines are well and truly underpowered. If specs matter enormously just buy it for PC! |
Theyre powered enought, if developers decide to actualy optmise things a bit and not spew bulcrap about how theyre AI is so much more advanced than any other AI on the market (wich is a blatant lie) that its bottleknecking even the GPU.
starcraft said:
Both the machines are well and truly underpowered. If specs matter enormously just buy it for PC! |
They intentionally held back the PS4 version, and Assassin's Creed controls are a nightmare with a keyboard + mouse.
generic-user-1 said:
the CPU cant be the problem, it will run on an allmost 8 years old intel without problem. its not that demanding if u compare it with other PC games that realy need the cpu power. and it has nvidia exclusiv graphic features and ubi is working close with nvidia. and ubi knows that they can get away with poor amd performance, because they dont care if u buy it on xbox or ps(it might benefits em if they sale the game on xbox, could be hat m$ is taking a smaller share of the price than sony) they will bundle it with nvidia cards like the last one and sale a shitloa of copys to nvidia for that promotion deal... |
The console wars doesn't have anything to do with Nvidia. Nobody thinks "OH WOW AMD!" when they pick up their console. It's pretty much a closed market and Nvidia has no game in it. It wouldn't benefit them in the least if some console game runs worse than a PC game with Nvidia because all games on PC run better than consoles no matter the brand of card.
And where are you taking that bolded from? I wouldn't be surprised if I run into a CPU bottleneck on PC with my 3570k. I mean look at the trailers. There is a shitload for the CPU to do. I'm talking RTS proportions.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.