I never denied your maths. I said that it makes no sense to use that resolution/fps difference to compare the whole game experience on both platform is ridiculous... So stop bullshiting with your "literally the fastest you've seen to forgot" etc...

As far as your exhibit (do you find yourself funny there?), just read the sentence again :) Maybe it is late and you are sleepy but I said that basically 99% of people find the experience equivalent. Not sure how you turned this sentence into a "majority find the PS4 multiplats significantly better". 

So.... where did you base that conclusion from?

I mean, you said it's ridiculous to compare the end user experience using math, which okay, fair enough. But then you go off and not only compare the end user experience based off your personal interpretation, without so much as any objective, measurable numbers or figures. Which is fine, if you're only talking about your personal interpretation, your belief, with no claims on how others would, or should, react. But then you insist that 99% of people totally agree with your interpretation, by finding the experience equivalent, meaning you're changing it from 'This Is My Opinion' to 'This Is Objective Fact.'

Soooo I'm assuming you have some facts to back up the fact? :3 Even something really nebulous, like a poll, a survey, some sort of study insisting that not only is the experience considered equivalent to a group of individuals- which I would agree with, because let's face it, the same can be said for all sides of the debate, meaning there's a group that thinks it's equivalent, a group that thinks it isn't, a group that randomly announced they like ducks, etc,- but that the VAST majority of people fall on one side of the debate or the other? We'll even be generous, and say 90 percent, instead of your provided 99 percent.

Perhaps you provided study links earlier in the thread, if so, would be much obliged if you could repost them. :3

So.... where did you base that conclusion from?

I mean, you said it's ridiculous to compare the end user experience using math, which okay, fair enough. But then you go off and not only compare the end user experience based off your personal interpretation, without so much as any objective, measurable numbers or figures. Which is fine, if you're only talking about your personal interpretation, your belief, with no claims on how others would, or should, react. But then you insist that 99% of people totally agree with your interpretation, by finding the experience equivalent, meaning you're changing it from 'This Is My Opinion' to 'This Is Objective Fact.'

Soooo I'm assuming you have some facts to back up the fact? :3 Even something really nebulous, like a poll, a survey, some sort of study insisting that not only is the experience considered equivalent to a group of individuals- which I would agree with, because let's face it, the same can be said for all sides of the debate, meaning there's a group that thinks it's equivalent, a group that thinks it isn't, a group that randomly announced they like ducks, etc,- but that the VAST majority of people fall on one side of the debate or the other? We'll even be generous, and say 90 percent, instead of your provided 99 percent.

Perhaps you provided study links earlier in the thread, if so, would be much obliged if you could repost them. :3

Yes, you have denied the math. You literally forgot what you have said in your comment before. You said that the majority of gamers (and you have explicitly said 99%) enjoy both versions equally. However, you, yourself, admitted that the PS4 multiplats are significantly better ("Significantly better gaming experience..."). And the majority of consumers find PS4 multiplats significantly better hency why you know, they sell better and move the PS4 hardware better, too. The differences quantitavely are large enough that they can see the differences qualitatively. We're not talking about a few horizantal lines of difference in resolution or 1-3 frames of difference. We're talking about 30 frames of difference or a twice-as-much pixels of difference here.

Even during its weakest month, XO sales were still 200k and that isn't likely to be repeated for years. Thats not huge by any stretch of the imagination but its not appalling either. That to me is the reliable North American sales compensating for non existant japanese sales and extremely poor eu sales. Its only reason the xbox hasn't dropped to Wii U levels and the same reason why it will be approaching 10m by the end of its first year.

I never said PS4 mutiplats are significantly better, what are you talking about...
Can you please quote me instead of replying that "I said it" over and over? 

I even directly quoted you and you denied your own words? That's..... not good. But if you say so.....

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6708416

"Significantly better gaming experience...  Nobody denied your ridiculous maths man"

As for your other comment: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6708445

P.S. In addition, you have failed to properly reply to Zanten's post. He asked for links, you just gave more unjustifiable personal opinions. I, on the other hand, provided links to studies on both resolution and framerate.

Dude stop talking about denying and stuff like that... Nobody is denying anything, it is just impossible to debate/talk about anything so far as you keep coming with you denial accusation reply after reply.

You just misunderstood my reply that's it. And instead of keep talking about denial, quoting me would have helped. Maybe it was poorly sentenced on my side but this was just a quote (the first part) of your post to insist on the fact that it was not significant at all (I should have added "sigh" instead of "..." I guess and then a response to your denial allegation... So no, I never said that PS4 multiplatforms were significantly better as I do believe it is the case (as you may have noticed...) So why on earth are you arguing with me about that anyway?