By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Zanten said:

So.... where did you base that conclusion from?

I mean, you said it's ridiculous to compare the end user experience using math, which okay, fair enough. But then you go off and not only compare the end user experience based off your personal interpretation, without so much as any objective, measurable numbers or figures. Which is fine, if you're only talking about your personal interpretation, your belief, with no claims on how others would, or should, react. But then you insist that 99% of people totally agree with your interpretation, by finding the experience equivalent, meaning you're changing it from 'This Is My Opinion' to 'This Is Objective Fact.'

Soooo I'm assuming you have some facts to back up the fact? :3 Even something really nebulous, like a poll, a survey, some sort of study insisting that not only is the experience considered equivalent to a group of individuals- which I would agree with, because let's face it, the same can be said for all sides of the debate, meaning there's a group that thinks it's equivalent, a group that thinks it isn't, a group that randomly announced they like ducks, etc,- but that the VAST majority of people fall on one side of the debate or the other? We'll even be generous, and say 90 percent, instead of your provided 99 percent.

Perhaps you provided study links earlier in the thread, if so, would be much obliged if you could repost them. :3

On reviews for instance? If the game is 225% better (you know gameplay wise, expericence etc...) why don't we see games at 5/10 on Xbox One and
10/10 on PS4 if the experience is so much better? Other things too like the controller? For some people it is a huge part of the gaming experience. The ecosystem (MS vs Sony or whatever else), etc...