OttoniBastos said:
|
Yeah it wasn't, but FFIV and VI were :P
OttoniBastos said:
|
Yeah it wasn't, but FFIV and VI were :P
MohammadBadir said:
Final Fantasy needs to go back to Nintendo systems where it was best. |
MohammadBadir said:
You think VII-XIV are better are than I-VI? :P |
Yes?? Cant really comment, I havent really played the Nintendo FF's because I dont like them from my initial impressions.
ktay95 said:
Yes?? Cant really comment, I havent really played the Nintendo FF's because I dont like them from my initial impressions. |
You should play them :P
Can we really take these reviews seriously?
Destiny (PS4) – 9/9/8/9 [35/40]
Destiny (PS3) – 9/9/8/9 [35/40]
Plants vs. Zombies: Garden Warfare (PS4) – 8/9/8/8 [33/40]
Plants vs. Zombies: Garden Warfare (XBO) – 8/9/8/8 [33/40]
Plants vs. Zombies: Garden Warfare (PS3) – 8/9/8/8 [33/40]
Plants vs. Zombies: Garden Warfare (360) – 8/9/8/8 [33/40]
What a joke of a magazine.
The PS5 Exists.
Anfebious said: So... Fatal Frame sucks. That's good, if it ever reaches the west I can safely ignore it. |
So a game that scores 82.5%, would translate to a bad game in your opinion?
" Rebellion Against Tyrants Is Obedience To God"
MohammadBadir said:
You think VII-XIV are better are than I-VI? :P |
A thousand times over. While I absolutely love IV, the rest of the series is just so much better.
GribbleGrunger said: Can we really take these reviews seriously? What a joke of a magazine. |
I enjoyed way more Destiny than Garden Warfare...
Not everybody shares the same taste
outlawauron said: A thousand times over. While I absolutely love IV, the rest of the series is just so much better. |
Eh, I don't agree. Though I guess that's the point of differing opinions :P
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.