So you are going to judge what people is as more wrong based on the number of people? So let me ask you this? How many people does it take before it becomes wrong? 10?, 20?, 100? 1,000? Seriously, How many does it take? The concenquenses should be the same no matter if it is 1 person or a million or by the level of it being committed. War crimes and atrocities are still war crimes and atrocities and people on both sides should be convicted but we know that will never happen.

What's the point of even charging him. He'll be dead soon.

The Nazi's did the crime so they needed to do the time LMAO(this old ass saying).

I understand how deep the mental pull of the Nazi regime was but they only had themselves to blame for letting themselves get to that point. The people loved Hitler. The 1st thing you must do is make the people love and trust you. That pretty much lessens the chance of them turning their back on you.  

They loved Hitler because he was fully behing the German people and pretty much blamed everything on jews if I remember correctly. Germany was in bad shape and Hitler pretty much created jobs for a shit load of his German people but that had a lot to do with running a lot of Jews out of their jobs and burning down Jewish stores i I remember correctly. They could've stopped Hitler but they loved what was to become. That motherfucker tried to take over that whole damn continent and probably would've did it if it wasn't for Russia. Even Russia almost lost having Stalin in power. It seemed like he was pretty much going to turn the whole continent into a German country or something. Germans were going to benefit greatly but only due to the other races demise.

And I'm not saying anything about the dude in this article because I dont know what he really did. I dont know if he's lying or not. Even if he was actually the person that killed the baby, he sure as hell wouldn't admit to it now. Just place the blame on somebody else from back then. They wont care. They're dead. But why bring this up now? They should've delt with this guy a long time ago.

That's not just naive, it's completely untrue.  There were certainly people who supported the Third Reich for one reason or another but it's established fact that many did not agree with the war or the actions of the government.  The Gestapo could do anything they wanted and were considered above the law.

However, resistance groups and those who were in moral or political opposition to the Nazis were stalled by the fear of reprisals from the Gestapo. In fact, reprisals did come in response to the protests. Fearful of an internal overthrow, the forces of Himmler and the Gestapo were unleashed on the opposition. The first five months of 1943 witnessed thousands of arrests and executions as the Gestapo exercised their powers over the German public. Student opposition leaders were executed in late February, and a major opposition organization, the Oster Circle, was destroyed in April 1943.

-

In June, July and August, the Gestapo continued to move swiftly against the opposition, rendering any organized opposition impossible. Arrests and executions were common. Terror against the people had become a way of life

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestapo

You would've smashed that babies brains all over that car huh, radish?

Regardless you probably would've had a deep hatred for jewish people if you were already an officer by the time shit started getting serious

They knew wtf was going on. Hitler pretty much expressed his hatred for jewish people BEFORE he was Furer. 

Yes, crimes are still crimes no matter how intense the crime was, I'm not saying what happened to Japanese Canadians and Americans was not wrong. But you can't equate almost exterminating multiple nations and peoples to the Internment, crimes are crimes but they do have to have to have weight on them. Also you can not judge all wrongs the same, as in you can't give the same punishment to someone who murdered 1 person to someone who murdered 100 people, that would be ridiculous. On top of that it's not so black and white, what if the criminal also forced those people into slave labour or they were horribly tortured, and experiments were conducted upon them, it further complicates justice. Which is why you can't directly compare one to the other. Both are crimes, however one was definitely much more severe than the other and justice has to scale for that.

Correct

But I wonder what Hitler would've written in the history books if he had won? ALL of europe and Russia would probably be called Germany right now. Jewish people would probably be more extinct than Indian/Native americans. 

Hmm.. I truely believe that if he had defeated Russia, he would've eventually tried to take over the USA.

You also have to remember that Japan was fully stuck up Hitlers @$$ for whatever reason. They were the main country backing the Nazi regime. America had no choice to bomb Japan. I used to hate America for doing that but then I learned that it was because they were aiding Hitler and wouldn't stop. Those people died because the Japanese government ignored the warnings right before the 3rd atom was about to get dropped.

But yea the war and what is done to the opposing prisoners is horrible on both sides

That is why I would've left before hand. I've read that PLENTY people left Germany before hand because they sawwhat was coming.

They didn't get strict until later on.

I'm telling you, anybody who stayed until it got strict knew wtf was going on and probably didn't care due to having a deep hatred for jewish people. There were probably a shit load of people leaving the Nazi Regime, Hitler seen it and eventually made it to where anybody who wanted to leave would be killed.

There were also a good amount of regular Germans who weren't Nazi's by the end of the war. These were the same people who were forced to clean up what the Nazi's did.

In the movie Downfall, it showed that Hitler got to the point where he started going up to anybody(including children) and making them join the war. He gave them a couple of days of training and sent them out. I'm not sure how true that is though. Hitler sent his people to the motherfucking graves!

Even if you sat there and followed orders, you were still going to die soon.

Double standards.

X killed people (its okay it was his duty)
Y killed people (he should burn in hell)

In my opinion, there is not right or wrong in war, just either killing or killing to stop killing. At the end of the day there are no "winners". Do we ever say that a police that shot a serial killer "won"? I hate any sort of glorification of war because at the end of the day, it is still murder or murder in self defense.