By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Starcraft Mafia - Game Thread - Concluded

TruckOSaurus said:
Wonktonodi said:
Seems we've got a game full of people with the watch and wait attitude. I don't like it at all. Most the vets are to quiet.

TOS attitude has taken him off my list of must trusted. He's used the extra time to be a lurking like scum and only come back in to stop a decent investigation. Need I remind you we need to find more than just a team if scum? Not only that I fully expect him to come after me regardless of how sparks flips.

Day two is pretty much dead to me. I have more reads on people, but I don't think we'll get more out of Carl now. Maybe Padib will come in one last time before we lynch sparks.

I don't mind an investigation on Carl,  but there's a part of your vote post that rubbed me the wrong way and that triggered my scum detector.

Wonktonodi said:

Carl though is something else. He can make decent case with the words that white has used, but between how he did that yesterday with Nick, and his putting sparks at L1 so early, I don't see that my vote can be anywhere else.

Unvote 
Vote Carl


You put forward two reasons, one of which is pretty solid (the L-1 vote), the other, I personally find weak but somehow in your mind that trumps the case against Sparks and now you "don't see that [your] vote can be anywhere else". What I see from this is you backing out of the Sparks lynch toDay and trying to push for a Carl lynch instead even though his case is much weaker. Something doesn't compute here if you're town.


If everyone comes to too clear a consensus that sparks would lynched. Then no one else will have the fear of being lynched to cause them pressure.

If I had added a for now or other throw away clause it would have reduced it's impact.

Your coming in and nullifying that pressure makes it look like you're trying to cover Carl's ass.


You missing or dismissing reasons for finding Carl



Around the Network

Town reads: Khan, Prof

unkown: Wrighte.

Mafia: Carl, Sparks and the confusing...one of : Wonk, Truck, Imp. I have a string feeling at least 1 mafia gives off a strong town vibe, but that's

Missed anyone? pretend I put them in unkown.



 Stupid phone.

Continued missing or dismissing my other points on Carl are bad one way and scum the other.

To reiterate and give your a benefit you don't deserve.

 

1. The case he was making on white over "doc hunting"

 

2. Putting sparks at l1

 

3. His not caring that the day would have ended.

 

4. His case against Nick yesterday

 

You ignored 1 combined 2 and 3 and are over dismissive of 4



WhiteEaglePL said:
Town reads: Khan, Prof

unkown: Wrighte.

Mafia: Carl, Sparks and the confusing...one of : Wonk, Truck, Imp. I have a string feeling at least 1 mafia gives off a strong town vibe, but that's

Missed anyone? pretend I put them in unkown.


If you think Carl and Sparks are both mafia, wouldn't it make sense that Truck is the most suspicious of the three of us (wonk, myself, trucks).

Right now it appears Wonk is pushing for Carl, but Truck is trying to keep focus on Sparks. If Carl is mafia as you think, which behaviour do you find more scummy: attacking Carl or sort of defending him?

Also, why do you think prof is town? Not saying you are wrong (or right) I just want to know what makes you feel that way.



padib said:

I am also very skeptical of your play. Khan is scum placeholder but Cone is town placeholder? What kind of wishy-washy logic is that?


The kind of logic that comes up when Spurge presses me to do some logic work xD



Around the Network

I dont see how my case against Nick can be used against me, when so many other people also noticed his poor play and questioning his motives/ overall play.

While he did end up being Terran, the cases against him were concrete... It was just poor play on his part that got so many people to suspect him (Ironic, considering my careless/poor play with the l1 is the main case you have against me)



                            

Carl2291 said:
I dont see how my case against Nick can be used against me, when so many other people also noticed his poor play and questioning his motives/ overall play.

While he did end up being Terran, the cases against him were concrete... It was just poor play on his part that got so many people to suspect him (Ironic, considering my careless/poor play with the l1 is the main case you have against me)


I'm mostly against you since I have a feeling you want me dead every once in a while.....for the past two Days.

 

Also, good night.



WhiteEaglePL said:
impertinence said:
WhiteEaglePL said:
Rereading what Trucks analysed, it makes sense Sparks is Scum, however it only seems to be a 1-sided argument, so I'm taking my chances and hoping he is right!!! Padib really will need to make up something good for Day 3 if he was lying about his bold, but still possible claim.(Makes sense as a unit in a RTS game to me so....)

Carl, I'm still watching you. I have also came to the conclusion that Eric is a confused townie, lol. Next day I will be concentrating on players I have not looked into much yet, like Write,Radish or Bugrimare (whenever he does post.)


I agree that Sparks is looking very bad, but please explain why you suspect Carl. Also, I am interested in why you think Eric is a confused town? I think he seems like he is mafia so what made you think he is town?

Carl keeps going at me this past time, ever since I claimed higher defence it seems to me. His posts have significantly dropped in number too, and usefullness I believe.  With Eric, his vote on me the first day was out of the ordinary, and before he knew anything about me. Unless there is some sort of role that lets you see someones allignemnet ect during the day, which I doubt.

So that leads me to think he was just guessing and doesn't really know how to play effectively at either allignement. Slightly, he gives me the impression that he does not fully care about this game, but I might be taking it the wrong way. He has been in my town column for a while now, ever since roughly mid-end of day 1. Most players however, are neutral for me. And Like I explained before in the about-to-kill-day post, I will be concentrating more on those players, but it looks liek it will happen sooner now, so still this day.


Why has this not been quoted by anyone yet?

white, why would it make more sense for carl to have voted you if he had a daytime scanning role?

pedit i mean eric.



Im also under the impression that you are quoting things that are being spoofed to you in the mafia thread.
and you are guilty of the rule of threes.



theprof00 said:

Why has this not been quoted by anyone yet?

white, why would it make more sense for carl to have voted you if he had a daytime scanning role?

pedit i mean eric.


whiteeagle was right and I already said that I was silly at the beginning



Click HERE and be happy