Mr.Playstation said:
If all other multiplats are better on said console and this is the only exception then something's fishy. |
How many multiplats were developed on Xbox One first?

Mr.Playstation said:
If all other multiplats are better on said console and this is the only exception then something's fishy. |
How many multiplats were developed on Xbox One first?

so a color-contrast difference, non-recreatable frame-rate drops, and a sunset bug that will be fixed in a patch?
LMAO

Only difference I see visually is lens flare.
And implementing lens flare is easy and not very costly operation.
Its mostly overly textures moving in accordance with sun's position and camera position.
If microsoft paid EA to make game look better on X1 and PS4. They might have used better post processing effects.
It can also be like sony asked EA to remove it because its distracting.
I don't think EA is so stupid to do something this stupid. Already gaming community has bad faith in them.
(Then again its EA you never know.)
P.S Just my opinion.
IamAwsome said:
How many multiplats were developed on Xbox One first? |
Exactly weaker platform= not lead platform. To be used as a lead platform some $$$$ were thrown around. Accept this simple fact Xbox one is weaker than Ps4, Microsoft is using it abundance of $$$$ right now to keep the console afloat.
Mr.Playstation said:
|
Did I just read,"they paid for extra polish"? What in the actual fu*k? That's unbelievable. That statement burrowed its way into my brain and sat there for a second like a time bomb and then just blew up. Microsoft exec guy: "hey there EA, how are you guys today? Hey let me ask you guys somethin. If I give you guys 10 gold bars, will you guys put a little extra polish on that there Madden football game?" Ummmmmmmm..........No
Mr.Playstation said:
Exactly weaker platform= not lead platform. To be used as a lead platform some $$$$ were thrown around. Accept this simple fact Xbox one is weaker than Ps4, Microsoft is using it abundance of $$$$ right now to keep the console afloat. |
All of the PS3's development kinks were ironed out by 2010. The 360 was still the lead platform for a lot of games though. Stronger platform == lead platform. The Xbox One appears to be the lead platform for this game. It was probably EA Tiburon's decision. Money was not involved in this.

todd2r said:
Did I just read,"they paid for extra polish"? What in the actual fu*k? That's unbelievable. That statement burrowed its way into my brain and sat there for a second like a time bomb and then just blew up. Microsoft exec guy: "hey there EA, how are you guys today? Hey let me ask you guys somethin. If I give you guys 10 gold bars, will you guys put a little extra polish on that there Madden football game?" Ummmmmmmm..........No |
Are you involved in the gaming industry. No, you just read reviews, news articles and so on on the web. These type of things happen its known as bribing.
IamAwsome said:
All of the PS3's development kinks were ironed out by 2010. The 360 was still the lead platform for a lot of games though. Stronger platform == lead platform. The Xbox One appears to be the lead platform for this game. It was probably EA Tiburon's decision. Money was not involved in this. |
Yes, the ps3 was stronger than the Xbox 360. But first off all it was harder to develop for the ps3 and secondly why would a company change the lead platform half way through.
PS: Why do all other EA games look better on the ps4?
Mr.Playstation said:
Are you involved in the gaming industry. No, you just read reviews, news articles and so on on the web. These type of things happen its known as bribing. |
I can't beleive that you actually think that has happened here, so many better places the money could go than denying PS4 gamers some lens flare...
