| padib said: Because the investigation made on RCT was made by town together. Your vote on outlaw was made badly, you admitted it yourself (I have nothing on outlaw). And again, it's a typical scum tactic to cry over spoiled milk. If town was wrong, it's possible because we have nothing else but deduction to work with and deduction is not foolproof. |
ummm...
padib said:
If we have a show of hands, I would be willing to defend RCT with my ability if you think someone is scummier and we have a strong enough show of hands and a proper case built. I doubt we'll be able to in the next 4 hours. Keep in mind, town has done its homework over 4 days. If we're wrong now, then we just need to go with what we built on and stay strong. |
I've looked and relooked and asked all day today for a better choice. So far everyone has pretty much ignored that request. I don't think there is any better option. If there was then Prof and Sparks would have given it since they appear very desperate to save RCT with no real reason why he is innocent and no real reason why outlaw is guilty.
http://www.youtube.com/v/AoOOpLpcF28 http://www.youtube.com/v/CphFZGH5030
All Hail the Jester King. The King is back, and I am still a dirty girl prof ;)
| TruckOSaurus said: Please break your replies in more paragraphs. I don't think you should drop your case against prof but you're falling into the trap of seeing everything little thing he says as bad because you think he's scum. Also, having only one target isn't efficient, you need to look at the global picture, have a few suspects, keep an open mind about changing your views about someone. |
Sorry about the big paragraphs. It's a bad habit of mine.
I have investigated others. Sure, I investegated Sparks and RCT based on my theories about prof, but it actually led to something, so can you blame me for strengthening my convictions about prof? And I investigated other as well. I tried a bit with Wright, and came to the same conclusions you did, he's either scum or really frustrated with the game.
I tried with outlaw too. I know you think I'm being too defensive of outlaw, but that's because he was one of the first people I started paying attention to once people criticized my over focus on prof. He was also just really easy to investigate, as I know his posting style, so it gave me a hunch about him. But just in case I was wrong about his posting style, and so I had more than a hunch to go off of, I did a little research. I wish I could ask Cone to vouch for me, since he visits the COMG thread regularly, but he's gone now. I'll ask him day 2 about that. That said, looking at the last 100 posts took all of 5 minutes, if that. Just scroll to a persons name next to their post, click view posts, and you're their. I did that to outlaw, and just counted the posts that started with "x user said". I figured 20 posts wouldn't be convincing, so I went to 100. How long does it take you to count to 100? It took me that much plus page loading times. Not much effort.
And I am looking at the global picture, this is just the best lead I have. I've said before I think there are two factions. Everyone I suspect of being in a faction with prof is pretty active, so unless we have a very, very silent town, I think the other faction is being quiet and mostly just trying to hide. I suspect spurge, Wright, and Khan, because they're quiet and are voting for Cone. Cone is a noob, and I think he's made it clear what he is, and that's why they're targeting him. No one is really pressuring any of them much, especially spurge. Of course, Cone is in no danger of being lynched, so I'm not worried today. We'll see what happens tonight. In the meantime, I myself am focusing on one faction, the more aggressive faction. It just makes sense to me to do so.
@hylian!
Padib just said he used his ability!
How are you even entertaining the idea that he can change it now?!?
Purely out of curiosity, can a mafia have these abilities and use them to fool the town into thinking they're on their side?
| padib said: Okay, you are paranoid. Take a moment, breathe, think and then come back to debate. Smeags accepting to wait before voting was hinted at here by Hylian and I thought it made sense. If you disagree, then explain. |
What Hylian said was FALSE. I never wanted to push the vote up to finish the day. He must have misread something, although that explains where you got the idea about me in the first place. Way to go Hylain ¡ and you should be more careful where you get your information.
I wasn't trying to get Smeags to push up the vote either. I was just calling him out on how he mentions that time is running out, but doesn't really do anything about it.
HOW IS YOUR ABILITY SPENT!?!?!
This is the wackiness role ive ever heard.
did words confirm this to you or was this conveniently left out of you role?
| theprof00 said: @hylian! Padib just said he used his ability! How are you even entertaining the idea that he can change it now?!? |
From ten minutes ago:
| padib said: If we have a show of hands, I would be willing to defend RCT with my ability |
I really feel like I missed something. Padib, did you or did you not say you'd already used your one-shot ability, and turned into a vanilla townie?
| padib said: Because the investigation made on RCT was made by town together. Your vote on outlaw was made badly, you admitted it yourself (I have nothing on outlaw). And again, it's a typical scum tactic to cry over spoiled milk. If town was wrong, it's possible because we have nothing else but deduction to work with and deduction is not foolproof. |
Are we going to pretend this never happened?
You see, Nickles?
On the other hand, if we do the tactic, we might gain some actual concrete info.
I'm not saying you should do it, but just watch out for padib in the future.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
WHO IS JESUS REALLY?
