Instead of telling me how bad Padib is why don't you please give me a good argument as to why Outlaw is guilty other than inactivity. I've been asking for one several times now and you guys keep ignoring it and putting focus on Padib.

Please break your replies in more paragraphs.

I don't think you should drop your case against prof but you're falling into the trap of seeing everything little thing he says as bad because you think he's scum. Also, having only one target isn't efficient, you need to look at the global picture, have a few suspects, keep an open mind about changing your views about someone.

You're not dead yet but if you're telling the truth you're as good as a Vanilla Townie now.

There isn't anything concrete. I've said that deveral times already. He just felt the scummiest, and action is better than inaction. Now you admit you have nothing concrete on RCTjunkie either. In fact, I wrote earlier how some of it is plain false and nooby.

About the strategy, think of the big picture, not just today. Having concrete evidence of mafia would be so much better than what we have now.

Either way, please, don't listen to padib. He was soooo wrong regarding everything he questioned me about early in the game. He would ask about things that were so obvious I alsmot didn't want to answer.

@nickels im at work o dont have time to go into it.
1. Claims his role is pretty useless.
2. Inactive
3. Doesn't respond to accusations
4. Was pretty much resigned to death earlier
5. Had to be prompted by padib to put up a defense

Again. It doesn't matter what outlaw is though.
because a player played his card (padib) this isnt about outlaw its about padib. If padib is telling the truth, then outlaw isnt lynched. (Which you dont want because you think outlaw is town). If padib is lying, outlaw is lynched but we have a confirmed mafia. A 1-1 trade with mafia is a very good deal. Additionally there's always the long shot that there mafia teammates, padibs lying, outlaw is scum lynched and we have a confirmed mafia. The probabilities are so much better to test.
on top of which, now padib doesn't want us to test it.

Plusees the very good possibility that if he's telling the truth and the lynch is blocked, then rct could likely be lynch as he's the next highest in votes! res

EBWOP

This isn't about outlaw anymore, but here, I found this: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6570003

Fair enough. I hate getting eliminated first day. I wanted to help, but I'm usually not super active unless I can contribute something meaningful. Then trying to participate I cornered myself. I suck at this game pretty badly apparently and don't blame people for their accusations towards me.

Best of luck, fellow townspeople. I'm going to a better place: To play Divinity: Original Sin

Well explain it to me because from my point of view, testing out your claim seems like a very good idea. In fact... let's

Vote: outlawauron

The underlined areas are things RCT Has done. This is absolutly about what outlaw is. You and sparks want me to vote for Outlaw. Are you fuckin kidding me? If you want this to be about padib and if you want me to vote for padib that's one thing, you should make an argument that outlines that. Padib is not a good reason to vote for outlaw. That is a huge mafia tell from both you and sparks. Neither of you can give me a good argument to vote outlaw over RCT. RCT. The evidence points to RCT being way more guilty. So I'm sorry it's not going to happen. I need a good argument as to why Outlaw is more guilty and neither of you have been able to deliver.