By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Fire Emblem Mafia - Game Thread - Concluded

Sparks on 10 August 2014

@padib. I know it's getting late in day1, but I had this in a tab so I thought what the hell.

padib said:

@Indented. You say that outlaw tried to answer your question but didn't. However, the post of yours immediately preceding this one reads "thanks also outlaw".

Sparks said:
Thanks also, outlaw.

Can you please clarify your suspicions on outlaw, you have him quite high on the vote list after rct's vote and your case seems to be built out of thin air. I will continue to go over your other posts about outlaw in the meantime. It's what I'm good at, I have a great ability to perceive things from far.

I had rephrased the question several times at that point, and he didn't answer what I was asking, so I didn't ask again. At that time, WoW came and answered, so I thanked him, and I didn't want to be rude, so I thanked outlaw too. The end.

padib said:

Yes, I've showed why he has not been a good option and why there have been better options.

I've showed that I think he's been answering honestly and when asked properly has been cooperative. I think that's evidence enough for day 1.

No, you haven't. Nothing compelling at least. No one seems to agree with you, either.



Around the Network
Sparks on 10 August 2014

Regarding IkePoR, another post in another tab:

theprof00 said:

Ikepor
VERDICT: Strong chance of town

He seems to be trying to hold back a bit. However, I'm going to reveal my trap that I mentioned earlier about the mafia daytalk. So, you know how I said I was just asking him to see if he was keeping up? Weellll, that was kind of a red herring. The REAL thing I was looking at was if he'd correct me....but for a different reason. I specifically told him that good townies pay attention when I mentioned the day talking. Specifically, if IkePoR was mafia, I would think that he would either want to correct me or question whether or not that was true. Being mafia, he would know for a certainty what the answer was...but he never even addresses it. My opinion is that he doesn't know the answer and wasn't keeping up, and didn't want to be arsed to go find out if what I was saying was true or not. To me, this hints that IkePoR is simply being lazy, which shows through in his posting quality and volume. There was another time when I asked him a question and he didn't answer me. I would simply assume he is not following along too much.  Also, his comment about quiet people waiting in the shadows to strike rings too closely to his own posting frequency. As a mafia, I don't think he would want to paint himself in such a light.

I disagree. I think he dodged the question on purpose. He didn't want to let on that he knew anything, and he didn't want to give the info to town either. Little did he know that we already knew the answer.

My dislikes: Not paying attention, only comes when called out, no contributions whatsoever, a lot of doging, shady as hell.



noname2200 on 10 August 2014

I can't agree that Ike seems town - I have him as neutral at the moment - but I'd prefer to let him be replaced instead of killed if there's a stronger lynch candidate out there, which I believe there is. Games with Truck are generally more fun, and besides he generally gets killed before the end anyways regardless of alignment. As an aside, are we sure Trucks is the sub? dgc is listed ahead of him on the sub list.

On the other hand, Truck seems to be the only player that's scum more often than he's town...



theprof00 on 10 August 2014

Trucks is a very good player. Do me it would be nice to have someone who is a pro also.
if there is no replacement we'll see quickly how wrll I am at determining who is what.

As far as two factions there is simply no reason to discuss it without evidence. It is a waste of time and a distraction.
words writes things in such a way that you cannot confirm anything. Thus is the mark of a good mod. No evidence, no discussion.



theprof00 on 10 August 2014

@no name
haha thats true he's always scum. But he's an easy read anyway.



Around the Network
Words Of Wisdom on 10 August 2014
Person Voting To Lynch Identity

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5  
Conegamer outlawauron          
HylianSwordsman theprof00          
IkePoR            
Mr. Khan Conegamer          
Nicklesbe            
noname2200 RCTjunkie          
outlawauron            
padib RCTjunkie          
RCTjunkie outlawauron          
Smeags            
Sparks outlawauron          
spurgeonryan Conegamer          
theprof00 outlawauron          
WhiteEaglePL            
Wright Conegamer          
  With 15 alive, it takes 8 to lynch.  

8 hours until Night 1 - http://itsalmo.st/#night1

If the vote count is in error, please PM me!



Sparks on 10 August 2014
padib said:

You're the one who mentioned Cone.

I don't get why you two keep mentioning him. There was a much clearer role slip in my opinion. Of course, I won't tell you either, padib.



theprof00 on 10 August 2014

Because he wasn't rolefishing.

You're the one who is.



Sparks on 10 August 2014
padib said:

No one seems to agree with me, can you give me examples of people other than you and prof who disagree?

Because you and prof, sorry for being brash, are quite the argumentative type and for some reason fail to look at provided evidence.

I didn't say people disagreed with you. I said no one agreed with you. I'm stopping there because coaching. I'm fine with no one listening to you.



Sparks on 10 August 2014
padib said:

No, I think you and prof overreacted. Plus if you're so sure there was a slip, why are you and prof not voting Wright for rolefishing?????

For once we agree? I don't know what the big deal is either. Wright was just blabbering.