By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Fire Emblem Mafia - Game Thread - Concluded

theprof00 on 10 August 2014
padib said:
theprof00 said:

So sayeth the lord.

Why are you taking such an interest in outlaw?

Because I think he's town.

See, this works both ways.

Evidence?



Around the Network
theprof00 on 10 August 2014
padib said:
theprof00 said:

See, this works both ways.

Evidence?

I've already provided it in many posts above, just re-read them.

Also, to add to my last answer, I'm starting to notice some piggybacking on his bandwagon.

NooooOoo, you've only provided why you think he's not scum.

And piggybacking on his bandwagon doesn't indicate that he's not mafia. It could simply be explained by people who don't know who else to vote and he's a good option.



theprof00 on 10 August 2014
padib said:
theprof00 said:

NooooOoo, you've only provided why you think he's not scum.

And piggybacking on his bandwagon doesn't indicate that he's not mafia. It could simply be explained by people who don't know who else to vote and he's a good option.

You deserve a smile for that. (@underlined)

Yes, I've showed why he has not been a good option and why there have been better options.

I've showed that I think he's been answering honestly and when asked properly has been cooperative. I think that's evidence enough for day 1.

The only thing I'm worried about is that he fits the profile of plenty of previous mafia that I've let get away on day 1s



theprof00 on 10 August 2014
padib said:
theprof00 said:
padib said:
theprof00 said:

NooooOoo, you've only provided why you think he's not scum.

And piggybacking on his bandwagon doesn't indicate that he's not mafia. It could simply be explained by people who don't know who else to vote and he's a good option.

You deserve a smile for that. (@underlined)

Yes, I've showed why he has not been a good option and why there have been better options.

I've showed that I think he's been answering honestly and when asked properly has been cooperative. I think that's evidence enough for day 1.

The only thing I'm worried about is that he fits the profile of plenty of previous mafia that I've let get away on day 1s

By not answering lame accusations? By not being aggressive in his investigations?

What games have you seen that in?

I'm looking right now. MIght take a while.



Words Of Wisdom on 10 August 2014
Person Voting To Lynch Identity

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5  
Conegamer outlawauron          
HylianSwordsman theprof00          
IkePoR            
Mr. Khan theprof00          
Nicklesbe            
noname2200            
outlawauron
         
padib RCTjunkie          
RCTjunkie outlawauron          
Smeags            
Sparks outlawauron          
spurgeonryan Conegamer          
theprof00 outlawauron          
WhiteEaglePL            
Wright Conegamer          
  With 15 alive, it takes 8 to lynch.  

23 hours until Night 1 - http://itsalmo.st/#night1

If the vote count is in error, please PM me!



Around the Network
HylianSwordsman on 10 August 2014

Holy crap this thread got busy.

Okay, so I said a while back I think prof is showing signs that he's coordinating with his team. I think Sparks is on his team. Prof even made an effort to distance himself from Sparks, by saying Sparks was buddying up to him: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6565700

RTC may also be on the team, with prof's accusations just being more distancing attempts. Prof has been very aggressive in getting rid of votes for him, not letting up until they change their vote. RTC gave up his vote on prof very easily, with very little pressure, and with no reasoning behind it, while everyone else that voted for prof put up a longer fight before giving up, if they gave up at all. RTC, having no reason to change his vote, made another distancing attempt, saying they "still weren't on good terms".

Prof also NEVER responded to my accusations of being on a team with Sparks, nor did Sparks when I called him out.

 

As I've said before, outlawauron's behavior is typical of him. I'm not sure he's mafia. I'm not even sure if he's really all that suspicious or not anymore. Especially now that he's sharing his thoughts. I don't think outlaw has a solid case for Wright, but I don't think we have a reason to vote for outlaw. We do have some reasons to vote for prof, however, and Sparks, and RTC.

Aww, padib went to bed.



outlawauron on 10 August 2014
theprof00 said:
padib said:

I don't see how he must defend himself over every flimsy case. It's up to town to see through them. He's free to post about whatever he prefers.

A good townie does not always need to defend himself. He should defend himself only when legitimate questions come up.

So sayeth the lord.

Why are you taking such an interest in outlaw?

lol, you don't get to be cheeky about that with your play style!

I'm also going to bed, but I'll look forward to our day 1 conclusion tomorrow.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

theprof00 on 10 August 2014

Lol @ air on
I dont expect everything I say is right. Padib does. Loke his little claiming up theory.

@hylian
seriously now come off it. It's over now. Big bad prof isnt gunna visit you while you're sleeping.



theprof00 on 10 August 2014

Hylian. One other thing. Why does it seem like instead of talking to me you're talking to the audience?



HylianSwordsman on 10 August 2014
theprof00 said:
Hylian. One other thing. Why does it seem like instead of talking to me you're talking to the audience?


Because I am. I want their input too. Now I'm headed to bed too.