Nickles:
Just a note, it's interesting that we used to have a player named nikells here. Always makes me think it's him, but it's not.

Seems excited to play. Confirms he's nervous. Makes his first accusation against cone, smeags, and sparks all working together. Not sure where he got this kind of insight. I ask him how he knows mafia might know each other. He says it was in the signups. Agrees that smeags is a pro. How did he know this? Anyhoo he says on the signups that mafia can only talk at night. After some talk about who can talk when yadda yadda he says i have poor reading comprehension, but that's figured out later on. Then there's the talk about actions

ugh

there's so much talk here I'm just going to skip it unless I see something interesting

One interesting thing so far, he thinks it takes 8 to lynch but the rules clearly say "the person with the most votes at the end". Is he trying to pretend like he doesn't know and wouldve partaken in a "woops" prof lynch? Hmmm

Thinks he will be murdered for some reason.

Also thinks that even if I'm mafia, I could cause a mafia to slip? Could you explain that Nickels? Just seems odd that I would try and trick a teammate (if I indeed know them...but like I said earlier, are we even sure they know each other?)

Hasn't shown up since I posted my statistical proof that he was wrong, which was about 23 hours ago. Not a suspicion, just pointing out that I'd like a response.

VERDICT: Slightly leaning town...maybe, 60%?
I have some questions that I'd like answered.
1. Why do you think you'll be murdered?
2. As a mafia, how could I be beneficial to town by getting a mafia to slip?
3. What do you think of my statistical analysis of people "clamming up"?

Before I thought it was a sure thing that he was town...but I'm not so sure now.

A contribution is either detective work, an interesting thought or addendum to someone else's inquiry, a vote on someone, or defending oneself from others questioning.

Before I continue, there is one thing I'm wondering about.

Name claims.
Someone brought up the point that mafia must've been given nameclaims for a reason. I'm not sure who it was and can't seem to find the post. It's really pissing me off that I can't find it. But it's a good point. Differential diagnosis people, why do you think mafia were given safeclaims? To me, there are two reasons.
1. Because there is someone out there who is trying to kill a specific character
2. Because WoW knew that having no safeclaims would indicate there is no such role.

Lastly, I don't like wright's comment about "Dual personality"

"Are you hinting at your double personality here?"

What did you mean by this, wright?

What do you think I meant by that, prof?

@Prof

I talked briefly about the still potential importance of the flavor.

However, I believe that at this point, flavor should not be discussed. It is information that I believe has more importance to scum than it does town.

That there was a fake claim involed.

No, it was in the last 200-300 posts I think. It was something like "what about safeclaims, there must be a reason why they were given", etc.

There's nothing fake. My accusation still stands against Conegamer.

That's not what I said. I said a fake claim, a secondary name that cone was hiding behind. Or maybe multiple personalities?

Yes, I meant multiple personalities. Just like a Cleric can actually be dangerous to the enemies, Cone playing the Townie doesn't mean he won't kill someone tonight as a Mafia.