I hope you're joking, but I don't see a smiley face.

Forget it, I've got to go to class, it starts at 11.

Didn't read the secion all about mafia tells? Interesting.

I'm interested in seeing Whiteeagle's read. One way or another, he's probably our most valuable asset at the moment.

What's LyLo? Something to do with that "final day" thing prof mentioned?

RCT would have been been alive if had a LaguzStone. ;)

WoW, as "punishment" you must go and replay Path of Radiance and Radiant Dawn.

Khan the facts:
"Sowing division and strife everywhere you wander. It's very unseemly." -was asked for posts to evidence this but never complied. Answered with:
"The votes speak for themselves, i think"

" I may use tomes, but i can't be asked to read all of this crap." Uses tomes

"As for changing to whom, i have my thoughts. Outlaw i doubt, but there are others."
"Unvote: theprof00. Vote: Conegamer"

Day2

"I for one want to hear more from Smeags" -Never follows up on this
"I still fail to see what the problem is with contentless posts. RCT's mixing it up and it nearly got him lynched." Defending RCT
"I also like RCT at the moment, but i have lingering doubts about Cone too." but likes rct for a lynch
"So perhaps this whole slip of the tongue does warrant further expansion, as rct's beaststone would be a false claim against his wyvern stone instead. Or the occam's razor route which is that WoW screwed up and RCT is telling the truth." Was right about wow screwing up.
" and sparks looks a good target, but i think the obvious shaky stories are Conegamer and RCT. "
"My point is that debate is pointless beyond the two suspicious points that we have. We should vote now between them and see what reaction that garners, then make the vote conclusive, lynch one, and move on to night 2." (cone and rct. Both were town)
"Some advice if you want me (and others) to switch: we should focus on RCT and Conegamer. You can likely dig yourself out of the little hole you're in now by rebuilding the case in that direction."

Day 3
shoot:whiteeagle
"I think the flavor post tells us Whiteeagle is the one sparks needs to kill. It's more likely anyway. If he flips town, then we go back to RCT Junkie, but whiteeagle's put a lot of damning stuff on the table just now." Suspects whiteeagle
"I think a flip for whiteeagle is the best way to clear cone, or not. Shoot him, flip mafia, and cone's basically cleared (then we can move on to RCT). Shoot him, flip town, and we can go on to lynch Cone"
"I should hope RCT is with me. No more will we stand up for your bullying. Town or mafia, this game is better off with you two dead.
Sparks, shoot him and then let us lynch you "
"At least i've claimed a power. If i'm lying, i have more imagination than some of us."
"So let's go back to talking about stealing something and using it, against your alleged better judgment, to murder an innocent."

Day 4
"I'm interested in seeing Whiteeagle's read. One way or another, he's probably our most valuable asset at the moment." Now doesn't suspect whiteeagle

So yeah, WoW made the mistake in nomenclature, which meant RCT was the wrong tree this whole time

Who voted for whom hasn't been a really reliable indicator this time around, because we're striking out in terms of mis-lynches, including confirmed town having vendettas against other confirmed town.

So... yeah. I try to think about it, but our claimed watchers or observers should be of paramount importance now. Didn't Nicklesbe claim such a role, before whiteeagle did? Not that the timing means anything, but toDay's focus should be on comparing their stories and picking suspects (likely one of them, honestly. Why have two?)

It's not that i suspect Whiteeagle per se, but feel that his testimony (and Nicklesbe's. Forgot about his claim) are the only things we really have to go on at this point. All of the rivalries so far have been confirmed townies chasing other confirmed townies, like Wright's push to get Conegamer lynched. We need more overnight information, and the claimed watchers are going to be the two sources of anything worthwhile at this point. Plus a vast likelihood that one of the two of them is lying, so the setup should pit the two of them against each other.

Khan, just wanted to note that I am merely writing down what I see as facts about you in this game so far. I'm not making any accusations. In fact, after that re-read I feel slightly better about you.

Prof:
"I would rather get modkilled then have the town waste a lynch on me.
if you guys want my flip so much, ill post it before om lynched.
any takers on who wants to take the blame for it?
Im thinking you might, hylian.
So how about it?
Ill modjidkill and you're lynched if I flip town. Fair?"

Hylian:
"You're arguing your case now. You're not doing a good job. Yes, my mind is relatively made up. No, I'm not risking killing two town with your stupid gamble. If you modkill yourself, it's on you. There's a difference between being sure and being reckless. I'm sure, but I'm not reckless. But here you are trying to sew more doubt and confusion."

Prof:
"Ohhhhh if I modkilled its on me? Youre a fucking coward. Put your money where your mouth is. I dont want to die. You want me to die. Accept your decision."

Hylian:
"And I'm not falling for your emotional shit again. Of course you don't want to die, scum. I don't care what scum thinks about my character. I'm no coward, I'm just not a fool."

"And to hell with this mexican standoff bullshit. The votes are where they are, I've made my arguments for prof, prof's only argument for me is that I want him dead and he claims he's town so that makes me mafia."

2 days later

Hylian:
"I've been on mafia wiki all game, dude, I've done a LOT of research."

Prof:
"Did you read the part that said that people who back down from standoffs are usually scum? :D"

Hylian:
"You're the one that backed down from a standoff, dude. You unvoted first."

From the Mafiascum wiki common tells page.

http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Mastin's_Insane_Tells

"A sub set of 5, this basically involves bets offered between players. Those who offer and don't back down on a bet have always been proven to be town, from what I've seen, as have those who accept the bets willingly. However, if someone backs out of the bet, then they're showing caution and a lack of a desire to gamble, or never take the bet at all, showing that they're not confident in their chioce of whatever the bet's about (usually about someone else's alignment).
This, essentially, means that those who refuse know they'd be wrong and would lose the bet. (they are showing) caution. A scum tell. While those accepting it would be more likely to be town, not knowing if they'd lose or not. Recklessness. A town tell.

Those who are unwillling to follow through/accept a bet are far more likely to be scum"