I did my own little run through of posts up until Smeags' first list, and did some basic, rough calculations. Note: I didn't consider shallow questions/answers much of a contribution. Also, this is very relative; I relied on my feels.

No activity: RTC, IkePoR. Never good in my book.

I have a bad feeling about outlawauron. His posts feel so shallow. He tried to answer my question, but didn't really... Not paying close attention? Other shallow/casual posters who seem like they're feigning interest (just a feeling), and have a somewhat low contribution-post ratio: Cone, WhiteEaglePL, Mr Khan, and Smeags a little.

I can't read spurge at all.

*I created my list before taking a look at Smeags' second list, so I could compare without fear of influence. Worth noting, although not what I had hoped honestly, is that both our tallies regarding what constitues an actual contribution are very similar.

I do agree that those who choose to not participate should be punished as they just hold up the game unfairly. So, speak up RTC and IkePoR!

(and I'm definitely taking the shallow posts thing personally! can't see myself answering anymore questions about the game. )

I agree about Mr Khan and flavor.

I think Nicklesbe wanted to participate in flavor as well, but made it a bit too obvious with his hints. Same with Wright I think. Just nooby things, no harm done.

There's a reason we exist. Which I don't know. But then there's people who wants us ceasing to exist. Which there's no reason for, really.

Well wright, we dont actually have to lynch anyone ever. We can just let the mafia kill one town I each night and not try and kill them. Thats a fair strategy.

That's way too submissive for my taste.

So then who would you like to lynch?

Conegamer.

Hmm. Curiouser and curiouser. Can't let this pass me by.

Whoa whoa whoa slow down!!! ;)
Ok so conegamer. Why?