Still don't like mr khan. Here's what I dug up about him:

On prof:
prof's debate tactics seem scummy
"Sowing division and strife everywhere you wander. It's very unseemly."
"all of this back-and-forth is confusing the piss out of me"
I ask him to back up his accusations, he responds that the votes on me speak for themselves

On cone:
Says he might change his vote but needs something more solid.
Unvotes prof, votes cone. Says cone's posts come off cowardly. And they should, if he's actually the doc.
"My vote, in both cases, was gut reaction. Hard to get a feel for your intentions, so i assume you're out to get someone. In cone's case (and it's about scum-flavored posts, sparks) there was a bit of strangeness from the getgo."
Missed cone's doctor claim

Random:
"I find this whole experiment relatively confusing, since it seems like prime bait for the mafia"

Wants to hear more from smeags

On rct:
says rct could be mafia, but the flavor problem could be a mod mistake
"That said, i'm going to let things play for a day or two before casting my initial vote. "

Back to cone:
"prof makes a good point about cone"
"Conegamer, RCT, Sparks, Smeags, and... hmm... Nicklesbe? Prof?"
" I think it's a three way shot as to whom i'll vote for tomorrow (real time tomorrow)"

On prof again:
"You decided to lynch RCT yesterday on very faulty grounds (some sort of slip of the tongue or something?)"
This never happened.
Votes prof
"Full willing to change my vote to someone whom i actually suspect, but only if he moves his vote off of me."
"Frankly i disagree with prof's playstyle, which has kept me wanting to vote for him until something better comes along (or in this case, voting for him to spite his vote for me). From what i can grasp of this game, it's to mafia's advantage to control the flow of events,m so the ones taking the helm are more likely to be mafia than not."
Suspects me for my padib teammate joke
"Starting to like my vote more now. "

On rct.
changes vote to rct junkie

Comments:
Well, he's not used a single post as evidence so far. He REALLY likes cone or myself or rct for a lynch. Never returned to smeags after saying he wanted to hear more. Liked his vote on me but switched to rct.

Not sure if scum, but a pretty wishy-washy game so far.

Things we could learn from a mafia khan flip:
Cone is liekly not mafia.
RCT is likely not mafia.

Things we could learn from a town khan flip:
Not much other than getting rid of a question mark lurker/absentee poster

What i'm saying this whole time is shouldn't the evidence here be self-apparent? We all have complete information, it's not like a courtroom where the court is likely not to know all the ins and outs of a case just from the getgo.

Not sure what you're asking me.

Hmm
only four people bit when I actually gave them a reason to vote me.
hylian, khan, cone, outlaw
only two voted
hylian and khan

Padib knew immediately that I was joking.
What to make of this...
are they town for becoming paranoid?scum looking for any reason to vote me?
Curious

Khan used it as reasoning to support his vote which he admitted didnt really have a strong basis before.
hylian surfing to categorically prove that I was disrupting the whole game
outlaw and cone just seemed really confused.
hmm

Hmm I said my team was sparks cone and padib
none of the three really took me seriously.
Town response?
Well cone kinda did. But unless he didnt read the team including himself, he should've known ...
hmmm

I know you're already past this point, but I just want to echo the sentiments of those saying hold off on him, at least for one more night.

Im going back to khan. I think his flip will show a lot mot than rct will play I dont like any of his supposed contributions.
Id like people to join me but I understand too that people want to pressure wright a bit.
I trust wright though.


unvote
vote: mr khan

I'm two days out and you guys made all this catastrophe.

Goddamit.

Riddles upon riddles.