theprof00 said: For example, your job is to find scum. you dont know what to say but if you want to win you'd try SOMETHING. to me it looks like you're not. See what I mean? You should be trying but you're not. Youre just hiding behind the noob card. That says scum.
|
In my mind we have the facts that point to either RCT or Conegamer hiding something. The rest is just petty he said/she said which is coming mostly from you, and increasingly in this Day from Sparks, which i do find bothersome but i've seen what happens with folks who talk to you, they just get led around and around in confusing back-and-forth that goes on for pages but resolves nothing. You decided to lynch RCT yesterday on very faulty grounds (some sort of slip of the tongue or something?), but then padib came out and gave his bit so you lot went to test his word and dumped it all on outlaw instead. Today there are better grounds for prodding more at RCT, and Conegamer due to his now-suspect role, given what we know.
My point is that debate is pointless beyond the two suspicious points that we have. We should vote now between them and see what reaction that garners, then make the vote conclusive, lynch one, and move on to night 2.
Though if you the two of you persist in dogging me, i'll vote one of you instead, falling back on my original distaste for your tactics stated in the previous day.
I'll take a look at what's said overnight and cast my vote for one of you four tomorrow. Let come what may after that.