By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Fire Emblem Mafia - Game Thread - Concluded

Not to mention that you were a prime target for last night.
targeting me was extremely risky.
imo looking at this game:
If i was mafia and knew that padib hylian and nickels and prof were town, I would try to set up the next series of mislynches by removing someone who argued with those three, and would also flip town.
This would make those three look bad and conversely make sparks and rct look better.

A lynch could easily be pushed on any of them for being noob mafia removing obstacles. Possibly something to do with multiple teams. This would set up a good lynch of maybe hylian or padib day 2. Once that comes up wrong, maybe push one of p adibs parrots day 3. Then possibly a lurker next?
Since that seemed to backfire, I would think the next option would be to go directly for a lurker. Can anyone looks through posts to see who might be pushing for a lurker? Eagle or wright or another lurker?

However, killing you would have accomplished the same as killing me...you seem to think exactly as I do, have similar suspects and town considerations. I have to ask myself why take the chance on me?



Around the Network

And cone was just left alone to protect me?
I sincerely doubt that.
You guys used just a regular kill to come after me?
You must've known the doc would never reach me.
redirected?
Im guessing he was redirected.



theprof00 said:
Change in playstyle from day 1 to 2 indicates teammate pressure during the night to calm down.*{1}
Sparks has been buddying up to me all game, yet when about to be lynched put me closer to the bottom than the top.*{2} http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6570880

On top of which, he specifically said he would do whatever he wanted today, regardless of padib's threats, yet now he's clearly different. He blames it on being shaken up.*{3}

Parroting has been insane as well day 1. He's responded to almost everything I have, and said very similar things. These responses in particular seem extremely similar. There are plenty more.*{4}
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6565686
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=187834&page=4

*snip*
That's staying there until I have a good reason to remove it.

1. Well, what can I say besides that it's simply not true.
2. I said it before. I had no idea whether you were town or not, it was just fun having you here.
3. I don't know what to tell you. It's the truth. It was a bit humiliating, and I wasn't having as much fun as before. Still, I'm still determined to win.
4. That post had nothing to do with anyone. I just wanted to address some things Nickles had wrong, so that if things went bad and we were both killed, he would hopefully be a good enough player by then to carry on successfully.

Now you think hard. Like it or not you have influence here as well. You have no proof of what your saying. Do you really think I'm scum? Yes, I'm more reserved. Confession: this is only the second time I've ever played mafia. I was excited since it'd been ages since I had played, but now I'm not having much fun anymore. That doesn't mean I'm giving up, I still wanna win. If I didn't, I would have claimed by now. Honestly, you're barking up the wrong tree. Just leave it at that.



Sparks has been like a less blunt and more savvy version of the prof, but fishing much in the same fashion, trying to sow suspicion.

I'm willing to look elsewhere than prof for the moment due to spurge's sacrifice, and sparks looks a good target, but i think the obvious shaky stories are Conegamer and RCT. I'll make a decision on the morrow as to which to cast my vote for, depending on how others seem to react. (Wright's anti-cone crusade has me suspicious as well).

If i had to guess a mafia out of the group, 5 of 15 as Conegamer, RCT, Sparks, Smeags, and... hmm... Nicklesbe? or prof maybe. 5th is hard to tell.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

theprof00 said:
Not to mention that you were a prime target for last night.
targeting me was extremely risky.

*snip*

However, killing you would have accomplished the same as killing me...you seem to think exactly as I do, have similar suspects and town considerations. I have to ask myself why take the chance on me?

I agree. That's why I had that post of my town-scum list ready in another tab. To post it right before nightfall. You see, I was preparing for the likely event that I was going to die. Then when I was about to be lynched, I went ahead and posted it early.

Honestly, though, I thought there was a 50-50 chance of either of us dying last Night. So it was you they chose, doesn't mean much. I would like to go back and see who you were accusing most on Day1. Maybe later.



Around the Network
Sparks said:
theprof00 said:
Change in playstyle from day 1 to 2 indicates teammate pressure during the night to calm down.*{1}
Sparks has been buddying up to me all game, yet when about to be lynched put me closer to the bottom than the top.*{2} http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6570880

On top of which, he specifically said he would do whatever he wanted today, regardless of padib's threats, yet now he's clearly different. He blames it on being shaken up.*{3}

Parroting has been insane as well day 1. He's responded to almost everything I have, and said very similar things. These responses in particular seem extremely similar. There are plenty more.*{4}
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6565686
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=187834&page=4

*snip*
That's staying there until I have a good reason to remove it.

1. Well, what can I say besides that it's simply not true.
2. I said it before. I had no idea whether you were town or not, it was just fun having you here.
3. I don't know what to tell you. It's the truth. It was a bit humiliating, and I wasn't having as much fun as before. Still, I'm still determined to win.
4. That post had nothing to do with anyone. I just wanted to address some things Nickles had wrong, so that if things went bad and we were both killed, he would hopefully be a good enough player by then to carry on successfully.

Now you think hard. Like it or not you have influence here as well. You have no proof of what your saying. Do you really think I'm scum? Yes, I'm more reserved. Confession: this is only the second time I've ever played mafia. I was excited since it'd been ages since I had played, but now I'm not having much fun anymore. That doesn't mean I'm giving up, I still wanna win. If I didn't, I would have claimed by now. Honestly, you're barking up the wrong tree. Just leave it at that.

So you're claiming to be a cat? Or a squirrel maybe?

Whatever. 

Well, I did say the vote stays unless I have a good reason. If you don't like it, then bus someone. Who is more deserving?
And I REALLY want an explanation about those multiple vests, or the OTHER person with a vest.
And I want that reply about my "theory that makes sense".

Thanks, I'm off to my second job now. toodles.

PS: Have fun.



Mr Khan said:

Sparks has been like a less blunt and more savvy version of the prof, but fishing much in the same fashion, trying to sow suspicion.

I'm willing to look elsewhere than prof for the moment due to spurge's sacrifice, and sparks looks a good target, but i think the obvious shaky stories are Conegamer and RCT. I'll make a decision on the morrow as to which to cast my vote for, depending on how others seem to react. (Wright's anti-cone crusade has me suspicious as well).

If i had to guess a mafia out of the group, 5 of 15 as Conegamer, RCT, Sparks, Smeags, and... hmm... Nicklesbe? or prof maybe. 5th is hard to tell.

Might I ask what is shaky about my story? I'm happy to provide answers to any questions you have to try and clear this doubt from me so we can work together and identify a Mafia threat rather than fighting amongst ourselves. So, anything I can help with in particular?

Also, indeed. I shall see you on the morrow.



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

Sparks said:

theprof00 said:
Not to mention that you were a prime target for last night.
targeting me was extremely risky.

*snip*

However, killing you would have accomplished the same as killing me...you seem to think exactly as I do, have similar suspects and town considerations. I have to ask myself why take the chance on me?

I agree. That's why I had that post of my town-scum list ready in another tab. To post it right before nightfall. You see, I was preparing for the likely event that I was going to die. Then when I was about to be lynched, I went ahead and posted it early.

Honestly, though, I thought there was a 50-50 chance of either of us dying last Night. So it was you they chose, doesn't mean much. I would like to go back and see who you were accusing most on Day1. Maybe later.

Killing the person who is accusing you the most is a death sentence. I was chosen because it discredits hylian padib and nickels. RCT would've done the trick but he has a vest...or so he claims. You could've sufficed, and likely would have had less attention than me.



theprof00 said:

Killing the person who is accusing you the most is a death sentence. I was chosen because it discredits hylian padib and nickels. RCT would've done the trick but he has a vest...or so he claims. You could've sufficed, and likely would have had less attention than me.

Not necessarily. I remember reading a mafia quicktopic after a game was over. They had chosen someone who was quiet but was on to them, and let the most investigative player live because he was going after townies so aggressively. They thought it would be benificial to let him live.

That's why I thought Cone protecting padib was a weird choice. They would have let padib live anyway, since he was directing town in the wrong direction. Regardless, Cone couldn't realistically have known that padib was wrong about me, so I let it go. In Cone's eyes, padib was now a confirmed townie, and therefore impossible to mislynch, and thus to him would be a target and needed protecting. Only spurge, with his experience in meta on VGC, guessed correctly and protected you last Nighht.

The point I'm trying to make is, I think you're overestimating the average player. Things are usually much simpler. Don't focus solely on what you would do. Think of what the average player would do.



Dont skip questions sparks.
What's this about another vest?
What theory did you think is true?

Who should go instead of you?