There aren't that many beasts in fire emblem. Mostly dragons, who are mostly scum. (i'm talking across franchise history, here)

So perhaps this whole slip of the tongue does warrant further expansion, as rct's beaststone would be a false claim against his wyvern stone instead.

Or the occam's razor route which is that WoW screwed up and RCT is telling the truth.

I'm not. I'm interested in your logic for accusing someone. You're not a beast, therefore you likely wouldn't know.

His knowledge of FE does not matter anymore.

He says Beaststone. He says Laguz. He says Lethe.

It's what he says his card says. The information is wrong.

@Padib

Because you are not part of any beast tribe. You are a Beorc (human).

I haven't said anything of the sort.

ANd what does that tell you?

The town is Laguz, it doesn't say tribe. 

Don't think of FE as "tribes". Think of each character having a role.

Rolf for example, I'm going to guess that your role was Archer, Sniper, or Marksman. Yes?

Paladins, Wyvern Riders, Assassins, Valkyries... there are a plethora of classes in the game that give each character unique abilities and roles.

Laguz is the name of a specific class of characters. It refers to humanoids who can transform into beasts (either with timing or Laguzstones).

When I refer to a tribe, that means that there are sub-classes within the Laguz. Cats, Wolves, Hawks, Ravens, Swans, and Dragons.

Not bad.

But, there are other options too.

Now we're cooking.

That's what I would suspect.