1 - I did a comparison and I was right about it, regardless whether you think it's fair or not. You can criticize the comparison, you can't tell I'm wrong.

2 - That is your reasoning. Mine is: PS3 started at 600€ and got to the 400€ price point on 2008, PS4 is at 400€ since the beginning. Today PS4 is doing poorly when compared to PS3 at the same price. But since the price doesn't seem to be an issue for you, then compare the PS4 with the Wii and see what happens (it was doing around 250k per week on the "equivalent" period!).

3 - How do you classify PS4 sales today? Do you think it's a good sign when people can only accept the challenge of comparing it to the PS3 (which was lagging behind the competition on the last generation)?

Yes, the graphic you quoted and made comments on supporting it. And my comments to you are also valid to Dr.Henry_Killinger, who posted the graphic but wasn't able to write comments he could stand for.

Your graphic is one big fallacy since it has little to do with the comparison I made in the first place. The point still remains and you didn't, you won't, you can't say a word about that.

The price point, like I said for several times but you continue to ignore what you can't counter-argue.

Dude give it a rest. the Ps4 is selling better than the competition and the Ps3 last gn. There is even a chart showing that. 

PS4 is selling 100k per week. No chart will make it differently.

I quoted the graphic along with your response to it.  My response was to your response.  It's called a quote tree.  Why is this so difficult to understand?  Then again, you are trying to compare the PS3's second year to the PS4's 1st year, so I guess I can understand why that's difficult to understand.

The price point means exactly jack squat.  You can't take an entire years worth of sales, with an additional 17 months worth of IP, and compare that to now.   Well, you can try, but it has no bearing on this, regardless of how many times you try to rehash it.

It's a dry month, everybody knows it, trying to use invalid statistics to hammer the point home, doesn't do anything but make you look silly.

PS4 is selling 100k per week. No chart will make it differently.

You continue to go around in circles. This has gone too far. Let's simplify it. Do you think PS4 sales right now are A - good, B - bad or C - neither good nor bad?

It's not about you being fair, it's about you being wrong. The PS3 got it's price drop around the same time it's library was ramping up, so your comparison in that regard is null and void. As for your Wii comparison, the Wii was a fad. It sold gangbusters for a time because of a fun, gimmicky motion controller aimed at Soccer moms and grandmothers, not gamers. Sales eventually fell off a cliff, while PS3 and 360 kept going strong. The Wii U's failure is further evidence of the Wii's fad status......the fad has passed. The great majority of people who bought the Wii moved on to mobile gaming and ignored the Wii U. With as much shovelware crap as the Wii had, it would have sold far, far, FAR less than it did had it not had motion control.  Comparing ANY console sales to the Wii is futile; because it was an anomaly, the market is returning to normal. As for your 3rd point, I'll bite. Compared to the Xbox 360's first summer, it too is being greatly outsold the by the PS4 during the same time period. So, the PS4 is therefore not only outselling the PS3, it's outselling the 360 as well. So, yes. You ARE wrong no matter how you spin it.