By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - EA Charging $4.99 for Demos on Xbox One

S.T.A.G.E. said:
Dark Chaos said:

So, why doesnt Nintendo charge? Why doesnt Steam charge?

Plus it was a mistake.

EA can charge whatever they want, its not MS decision. Sony allowed GT5 prologue to get a full fledged release and this is no different.


Microsoft tried to get PC gamers to pay for online gaming with Windows Live, but it failed. Gamers united and turned down Live on PC. Um....no. MS allowed them to make these charges on Xbox Live.

Prologue was a taste test for GT5 because it was eagerly awaited being as popular as the GT franchise was (is) and had three updates within the period of time before GT5 finally released. If you want to talk about a glorified demo that could be beaten in five minutes look no further than MGS.


So why is Sony doing it? Shouldnt gamers unite and turn them down as well according to you?



Around the Network
Xenostar said:
The Fury said:
Yeah this just seems like an error. Mainly because it is only Xbox One, if they were going to do something so utterly ridiculous they would do in on all consoles.

Geez, I just looked on PSN Store, FIFA 14 on PS3 is £60? Are they insane? Who decided that price? I'd be surprised if anyone bought the digital version at that cost now.


Hopefully Sony and Nintendo, told them to fuck off if they think there charging for a Demo.


Sure, and only the evil itself, MS, said "go on, let's rip off gamers! You know what? Charge even more! Ha!"

Srsly?!



"now it could just be a pricing error" but lets run the article for maximum hits before we do the journalistic thing of contact microsoft or ea to confirm.

Classy.



walsufnir said:
Xenostar said:
The Fury said:
Yeah this just seems like an error. Mainly because it is only Xbox One, if they were going to do something so utterly ridiculous they would do in on all consoles.

Geez, I just looked on PSN Store, FIFA 14 on PS3 is £60? Are they insane? Who decided that price? I'd be surprised if anyone bought the digital version at that cost now.


Hopefully Sony and Nintendo, told them to fuck off if they think there charging for a Demo.


Sure, and only the evil itself, MS, said "go on, let's rip off gamers! You know what? Charge even more! Ha!"

Srsly?!

Ive already posted it was an Error on EA's behalf. 



Xenostar said:
walsufnir said:
Xenostar said:
Hopefully Sony and Nintendo, told them to fuck off if they think there charging for a Demo.


Sure, and only the evil itself, MS, said "go on, let's rip off gamers! You know what? Charge even more! Ha!"

Srsly?!

Ive already posted it was an Error on EA's behalf. 


Didn't stop you from showing your first impressions when you read the thread. It didn't stop you and others to assume the worst while making others "shine". Just shows people's way of thinking and prejudices.



Around the Network
jlmurph2 said:
Dark Chaos said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:


It never was that way until Microsoft came to gaming with their ridiculous charges. When one company sees gamers willingly paying for online you cant look away. With the financial situation Sonys in I cant blame them. Before then Nintendo and Sony were free for online. 

Actually, I should be asking you a question. Wasn't it Microsoft who allowed EA to do this to Xbox One owners? In the end American corporations will always be American corporations. Take exploitation and turn it up.

So, why doesnt Nintendo charge? Why doesnt Steam charge?

Plus it was a mistake.

EA can charge whatever they want, its not MS decision. Sony allowed GT5 prologue to get a full fledged release and this is no different.


When MS does it, its exploitation. When Sony does it, its them trying to survive so its cool.  Does the price of online really matter anymore these days? You can make your money back on free games in like 2 months tops. 1 month if you find a $30-35 deal on Ebay or Amazon, which happens like 3 or 4 times a year.


In the beginning it was exploitation. As Michael Pachter said, gamers paid for it and because they paid for it, they are sending a message to the industry through their wallets. PC gamers denied it, Xbox gamers encouraged locked down gaming and subscription based services because it was "worth it". Microsoft and Sony are competing for the same crowd of gamers. It was MS who dipped into Sony's former marketshare (that they are currently taking back) and wooed them away early on who accepted this nonsense. That sent a message to Sony that it was ok and who could blame them when they were bleeding from risking everything to save Blu Ray and won the format war? 

Exploitation turned into a norm, but on the way brought their own service and wooed gamers into it by not taking away their subscriptions and locking gaming down, but rather the example of giving a real service to gamers. Xbox Live wasnt a service, it was a sham. Sony gave games to gamers because thats why they buy their consoles, right? To play games? Microsoft saw that what Sony did was working so it by copying them it gave them good reason to drop peoples subscriptions. 

You can rationalize exploitation all you want. Its here to stay because of MS. Sony used it because MS was making hand over fist off of gamers, but decided to implement it in a lighter way by making it only for multiplayer and the usual perks Plus provided.



TheGoldenBoy said:
That has to be an error. Even EA isn't that stupid . . .

Yes, a deliberate error to test the waters.



 

The PS5 Exists. 


Next gen has begun.



kowenicki said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Dark Chaos said:


Microsoft tried to get PC gamers to pay for online gaming with Windows Live, but it failed. Gamers united and turned down Live on PC. Um....no. MS allowed them to make these charges on Xbox Live.

Prologue was a taste test for GT5 because it was eagerly awaited being as popular as the GT franchise was (is) and had three updates within the period of time before GT5 finally released. If you want to talk about a glorified demo that could be beaten in five minutes look no further than MGS.

So why didnt Playstation gamers unite and tweet Yosh and tell him they werent happy?    I sure because they are 4thegamerz and Yosh is the most amazing man on the universe they would have relented.

Get real and get off the MS bashing crusade.

 

 


LOL Microsoft were led by example like good little boys because sometimes it takes competition to show you that you're wrong. Look at the Xbox today and what it couldn't have been if people hadn't flipped their shit at Microsofts policies. Maybe it takes a guy like Spencer to appoloize for the games Microsoft plays with consumers and make promises for MS to be more "transparent" with consumers. 

Yes, I am on a MS bashing crusade. Everything I said was just made up because you want to ignore its existence.



walsufnir said:
Xenostar said:
walsufnir said:
Xenostar said:
Hopefully Sony and Nintendo, told them to fuck off if they think there charging for a Demo.


Sure, and only the evil itself, MS, said "go on, let's rip off gamers! You know what? Charge even more! Ha!"

Srsly?!

Ive already posted it was an Error on EA's behalf. 


Didn't stop you from showing your first impressions when you read the thread. It didn't stop you and others to assume the worst while making others "shine". Just shows people's way of thinking and prejudices.


I said Hopefully they wont allow it, not Sony and Nintendo are some morale shining light.

Your just showing your prejudices.