jlmurph2 said:
Dark Chaos said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
It never was that way until Microsoft came to gaming with their ridiculous charges. When one company sees gamers willingly paying for online you cant look away. With the financial situation Sonys in I cant blame them. Before then Nintendo and Sony were free for online.
Actually, I should be asking you a question. Wasn't it Microsoft who allowed EA to do this to Xbox One owners? In the end American corporations will always be American corporations. Take exploitation and turn it up.
|
So, why doesnt Nintendo charge? Why doesnt Steam charge?
Plus it was a mistake.
EA can charge whatever they want, its not MS decision. Sony allowed GT5 prologue to get a full fledged release and this is no different.
|
When MS does it, its exploitation. When Sony does it, its them trying to survive so its cool. Does the price of online really matter anymore these days? You can make your money back on free games in like 2 months tops. 1 month if you find a $30-35 deal on Ebay or Amazon, which happens like 3 or 4 times a year.
|
In the beginning it was exploitation. As Michael Pachter said, gamers paid for it and because they paid for it, they are sending a message to the industry through their wallets. PC gamers denied it, Xbox gamers encouraged locked down gaming and subscription based services because it was "worth it". Microsoft and Sony are competing for the same crowd of gamers. It was MS who dipped into Sony's former marketshare (that they are currently taking back) and wooed them away early on who accepted this nonsense. That sent a message to Sony that it was ok and who could blame them when they were bleeding from risking everything to save Blu Ray and won the format war?
Exploitation turned into a norm, but on the way brought their own service and wooed gamers into it by not taking away their subscriptions and locking gaming down, but rather the example of giving a real service to gamers. Xbox Live wasnt a service, it was a sham. Sony gave games to gamers because thats why they buy their consoles, right? To play games? Microsoft saw that what Sony did was working so it by copying them it gave them good reason to drop peoples subscriptions.
You can rationalize exploitation all you want. Its here to stay because of MS. Sony used it because MS was making hand over fist off of gamers, but decided to implement it in a lighter way by making it only for multiplayer and the usual perks Plus provided.