By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Value proposition. MCC vs. LoU remastered

jlmurph2 on 24 June 2014
Saeko said:
Wright said:

Alright. Both games offer crappy value, if you have played them already.


This, i think halo is weaker, but because i hate FPS lol, but more seriously, if you think about this, you have 4 halo on xboxone, there will not be many players in multi because fanbase will be mostly on 2 i think. so 1-3-4 will be useless, i may be wrong and hope for the fan who buy for 1-2-4.

Its a unified multiplayer where you vote for which map and game you play. Everyone will be in the same multiplayer.



Around the Network
Fusioncode on 24 June 2014

I guess you're a sucker either way.



Sigs are dumb. And so are you!

platformmaster918 on 24 June 2014
gergroy said:
platformmaster918 said:

Before we begin let me make clear that if I owned an Xbox One I would most definitely be getting MCC.  Aside from loving the best possible versions of games I believe it offers tremendous value.  Also all prices are according to Amazon and of course I rounded on many.

 

MCC vs. LoU remastered.

 

LoU is $30 on PS3 right now.  A bundle with the season pass costs $80.  That's $80 worth of content for $50.  It's a 1 year old game.

 

Halo 4 is $16 now.  Halo 3 is $13.  Halo Anniversary is $19.  Halo 2 is $18.  $66 worth of content I suppose.  The games range from 2 to 13 years old (at time of release).

 

Both will be 1080p 60fps and feature improved online functionality from their originals.  Lest we forget that Sony has done many a 3 game HD collection for $40 in which all the games were 1080p 60fps (Sly, Jak, Ratchet).  Why is it that the LoU is the one catching slack again?  I'm not saying MCC is a bad value but they're basically the same value to me.  Just be consistent.  If you're going to insult one's value insult the other's.


You count the dlc for LoU but not the halo games?

changed to Goty edition for Halo 4.




Get Your Portable ID!Lord of Ratchet and Clank

Duke of Playstation Plus

Warden of Platformers

Saeko on 24 June 2014
jlmurph2 said:
Saeko said:
Wright said:

Alright. Both games offer crappy value, if you have played them already.


This, i think halo is weaker, but because i hate FPS lol, but more seriously, if you think about this, you have 4 halo on xboxone, there will not be many players in multi because fanbase will be mostly on 2 i think. so 1-3-4 will be useless, i may be wrong and hope for the fan who buy for 1-2-4.

Its a unified multiplayer where you vote for which map and game you play. Everyone will be in the same multiplayer.


ok, lot better then what i tough  :)



platformmaster918 on 24 June 2014
jlmurph2 said:
So you count TLOU DLC but not Halo's? Also there's Halo 5 beta and Halo Nightfall

there I changed Halo 4 to Goty edition




Get Your Portable ID!Lord of Ratchet and Clank

Duke of Playstation Plus

Warden of Platformers

Around the Network
jlmurph2 on 24 June 2014
platformmaster918 said:
jlmurph2 said:
So you count TLOU DLC but not Halo's? Also there's Halo 5 beta and Halo Nightfall

there I changed Halo 4 to Goty edition


Then how about Halo 2 and Halo 3 DLC?



platformmaster918 on 24 June 2014
jlmurph2 said:
platformmaster918 said:
jlmurph2 said:
So you count TLOU DLC but not Halo's? Also there's Halo 5 beta and Halo Nightfall

there I changed Halo 4 to Goty edition


Then how about Halo 2 and Halo 3 DLC?

really don't feel like dat research lol at this point I should hope you get the complete game for a game that's over half a decade old and a game that IS a decade old




Get Your Portable ID!Lord of Ratchet and Clank

Duke of Playstation Plus

Warden of Platformers

Teeqoz on 24 June 2014

I belive that when most people talk value, they don't talk about what one game is priced on PS compared to what the other game is priced on Xbox, I think they talk about the amount of playtime you'll get out of the game. If we go by that definition of value then Halo: MCC wins (I assume, since it's four games vs one).



Frogger on 24 June 2014
Teeqoz said:
I belive that when most people talk value, they don't talk about what one game is priced on PS compared to what the other game is priced on Xbox, I think they talk about the amount of playtime you'll get out of the game. If we go by that definition of value then Halo: MCC wins (I assume, since it's four games vs one).


That should be the only definition of value. You get exponancially more for your money. This shouldn't even be up for descussion. 4 games vs 1. The end.



Teeqoz on 24 June 2014
spemanig said:
Teeqoz said:
I belive that when most people talk value, they don't talk about what one game is priced on PS compared to what the other game is priced on Xbox, I think they talk about the amount of playtime you'll get out of the game. If we go by that definition of value then Halo: MCC wins (I assume, since it's four games vs one).


That should be the only definition of value. You get exponancially more for your money. This shouldn't even be up for descussion. 4 games vs 1. The end.


Yay, someone agreed with me!