oh ok got it

Err okay now the title is simply misleading -_-

You dont have to have the same title as the original article...

I know but I also felt the last title was not entirely true cause he did break the rules so he kinda deserved the ban. 

EDIT: Ok I'll change it back if its causing confusion. 

lol you right both titles is misleading

Not sure what would be an appropriate title.

I believe this is one of the big problems with the internet and these types of articles. The headline paints a picture that this guy was banned because he submitted feedback to MS on an external HDD issue. A lot of people never go to the article and are making judgement and decisions on the headline. Now the thread is full of misinformation and people taking a stance on limited info.

seems a blatant case of him breaking the terms of the beta agreement, he wasn't banned for the feedback, he was banned for breaching his contract. The headline in no way represents what happened.

Changed it! Sorry about this thread's title. I just copied it from the article's site.  

I presume you realise that just because you assert a position that doesn't mean that you have made a compelling argument.

I believe you've written end-user documentation.  I don't believe you've written fool-proof end-user documentation.

Did you even read my post?  I've not argued against anything - I simply identified that there are users who would not be confident performing tasks more complex than simple installations.  Are you seriously arguing against that?

Maybe you'd find the flies would go away if you stopped talking shit.

I've been uploading Nintendo content videos and had no troubles, it is if I activated ad revenues on them that I would have some problems with Ninty, but with the upcoming program, people would get part of the money generated with videos, instead of nothing at all. Of course other companies don't give a crap and let people generate money without asking for a part of it, but they could do, it's their rights.

So then guess how the youtubers became famous in the first place? Correct!  because they played the games people knew and were only found because someone looked for e.g Mario etc. on youtube.  So not only does a lets player "support" the company but the company made the lets player famous and is the reason why the youtuber was able to earn money online.

And when I consider myself a supporter of a company then why do I whine when I generate a steady flow of income for that said company? I should be happy to be of use but instead I whine... The whiners are no real fans at all.

Also I cant see people complaining about youtube getting some of the revenue so why do they whine when the other actual reason (the first one being youtube) for them being famous (gamemaker) also wants a fair share of the revenue?

I mean how dare youtube wants some of the revenue when youtube just became famous because people uploaded videos!!!!!  People supported youtube Its unbelievable! Call the media youtube wants money they deserve!!!

Fact is people feel entitled to money they are not entitled to get. They got used to it and now something changes and they start whining.

and btw that I am the first gamer that you met who thinks this way is quite sad actually... probably because most "gamers" today are just mainstreamers doing what all the others do whining when everyone whines and hating when everyone hates people without own opinions.

TBH youtubers should only get money if a person watches 100% of the video. Getting money because people are forced to watch a commercial just to find out the content is shit and leave is FAIL. Not viewer count should result in revenue but actual viewers that watch the content for at least a minute.

So since this is way to off topic  lets PM each other or whatever  in case you want to discuss this topic further    I wont discuss this here anymore.  Thanks for your understanding :)