Look at it this way.
In march 05, or whatever, MS launched the 360.
Around 5 years later, it introduced kinect.
2 years later, it made them both accessible for 199$ in a bundle.

In november 2013, MS launched what is basically that 199$ console for 499$

Consumers, especially the casuals who are most interested in kinect, are wondering why they should choose xb1 over 360 when the kinect functions they want are easily fulfilled by the cheaper "model".


Essentially, when Yusuf Medhi says that gamers are happier with 360 than ps3, what he's actually saying is that consumers are happier to purchase the 360 over the xb1... whereas the opposite is true with playstation consumers. I can only imagine that 360 might even start outselling xb1 at some point.
I've been saying for so long that ms could've gotten a lot more out of 360 and could've held off on xb1 launch.

Humor me.

Microsoft is sounding like Sega right now.

The "this is how you share games on PS4" video, was a pretty petty shot at MS at the time, whether you guys think it was justified or not.Then the parity clause "chart" that Sony made showing how they have no requirements for indies where as MS did.

Sony started the corporate mud-slinging and its only fair MS can fire back. 

Except Sony never mentioned Microsoft in any of those adverts. Even if it was in response, Microsoft wasn't forced to enact those policies. Conversely, this is a blantant potshot based on delusional rhetoric.

Lol.