Well, I was refering to what both are working on with there next gen or two. 

Windows now runs on ARM as well as x64. It makes it possible to make a Windows tablet which should have a really nice batter life.   ARM chips are less powerful, but they use quite a bit less power.   So you make some sacrafice, but get some bonuses.

Intel, seems to be heavily foccuses on lowering the power for their chips, more than just making them more powerful right now.  I know their shrinking manufacting process helps, but it's also how they are designing the chip. And the new DDR4 RAM runs at a lower voltage too.

Intel wants to get into more phones.  They are replaced so often - it's a good business to be in.

No, I wrote "should Intel slow down" meaning "if Intel slowed down".
AMD isn't the competitor it used to be in its best moments, but it's still at least some competition in the value range and IMVHO it's too optimistic to think that with no competition at all Intel wouldn't abuse its monopoly position. Its past record gives us no reasons to not worry.

Newsflash, Intel will never slowdown ... AMD has only had 3 good years out of it's entire 45 years in the business. Their shares used to be worth over $30 a piece but now it's less than $5 a share. 

How exactly is selling chips at a loss a competition ? There is no competition, period. Trust me, If AMD left the x86 market right now I bet Intel wouldn't bat an eye and just continue making more processors like no one's business. For the past 8 years AMD has being doing nothing but failing or sucking at the same time according to Cliff Maier to which I wholly agree on.

All the moves that AMD has made in the past years such as respinning the same old chips in the past, spinning off their fabs to globalfoundries, and dropping their high performance x86 segment just shows that their all that desperate.

AMD is nothing but shame and abomination in my eyes after all these years of supporting their one and only worthwhile graphics division. The AMD that I once knew that made the Athlon 64's back in the days weren't so lame or such cowards like they are now. They have dishonored their once good brand and name therefore they are not worthy being memorable anymore in my eyes anymore like they used to be. 

Like it or not this is coming from an AMD graphics chip customer and I only see AMD in a state of disgust or disgrace. It's all their fault for bringing this upon themselves. 

Actually, that's not true. The margins on phone chips are razor thin. Intel are required to maintain 60% gross margin by their major investors, so outright selling phone chips in place of current competitors is impossible for them.

Well, this site from Intel seems to disagree with that:  http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/smartphones/smartphones.html

"Smartphones with Intel Inside®"

The main reason for Intel to chase phones and tablets is mostly to try and keep x86 as relevent as possible, only three manufacturers actually create x86 processors, two of which have an insignificant market share, thus Intel by extension has a monopoly on the x86 market.
If ARM gains traction, then the value of x86 declines as OEM's have other alternatives that are potentially cheaper, not a good proposition for Intel as suddenly it has dozens more competitors.

Thus they *must* compete with ARM.
Intel have already released mobile processors utilising Atom (Aka. Medfield and it's derivatives), which were not only faster, but more-often cheaper than their ARM equivalents, the largest design win however was with Samsungs Galaxy Tab 3 10.1, a mid-range tablet.

You mentioned GPUs and you didn't notice it's just a field Intel never was able to compete in, but AMD, since it merged with ATI, was and still is. AMD financial troubles surely affects its possibilities, but don't disprove its talent, rather it tells us very bad things about its management. Like Sony, AMD would better be taken over by some rich and well managed giant.
And you keep on trusting Intel despite history should have taught you not to.
You're right about being pissed off with AMD for having wasted its past advantage, but don't let your disappointment blind you.
As for me, I'd like IBM to take AMD over, they already collaborated and they are in good relationships, maybe the only thing preventing it is that IBM surely wants to maintain good relationships with and keep on licensing its patents to every chip producer, including Intel.

Oh just you wait ... Intel won't be entering in the discrete GPU market but they have a GPGPU compute solution just for the HPC market that will outright shit on both AMD and Nvidia right there. 

Don't disprove it's talents ? AMD's CPU team have no talents! How am I supposed to believe that a floundering division has talent when they don't even have the guys that made the Athlon 64's while getting humiliated for 8 whole years straight up!

Unlike AMD, Sony on the other hand has actual potential to be profitable and the amount of money they get off of the insurance division destroys what AMD get's from it's graphics divsion. AMD's management is alot worse than Sony's so there will be no spinning it. 

Do you have a reason to not trust that Intel will deliver on their products compared to AMD ? 

Tell me a reason to be not dissappointed ... They have squandered every god damn chance they can get their hands on. Intel sharing patents with AMD is a total loss. They have no money left to boot and they sold off their own god damned fabs only to have a second rate foundry replace their semiconductor manufacturing process. (Though I guess globalfoundries have done something useful for once like licensing samsung's 14nm technology but AMD will also screw up that chance too judging by their history.)

The real kicker here is if anyone purchases AMD they will lose all rights to it's x86 patents and that includes is AMD64 license whereas Intel gets to keep every x86 patents if it gets bought by a larger entity! All of AMD's x86 patents are not transferable compared to Intel. 

Intel owns the original x86 patents and many 32-bit extensions, like MMX, etc, but AMD created and owns x86-64 extension. Intel already filed a lawsuit against AMD when it split research and development from manufacturing and they reached an agreement extending the cross-licensing terms.
BTW, AMD uses RISC cores with an instruction translation layer since the k5, this could be used in tribunal if AMD were taken over by a corporation able to challenge Intel more effectively.
About the money, or lack of, I agree with you, that's why I wish some company take AMD over.

Oooh Looks like someone could use a history lesson.