Well, usually on Nintendo consoles, the A button is set to select things and the B button is set to go back just like the screen posted, but who knows...
Well, usually on Nintendo consoles, the A button is set to select things and the B button is set to go back just like the screen posted, but who knows...
Rogerioandrade said: I have a bad feeling about this game.... |
Yes, it could go either way. Cautiously optimistic.
pezus said:
Also on Xbox, no? |
yea but remember we can plug a 360 controller into a pc too guys.
Praise the One.
pezus said:
Also on Xbox, no? |
SweetTalia said: yea but remember we can plug a 360 controller into a pc too guys. |
Some guys did pixel count in the image and it seems not to be PC because the resolution seems to be ~960p but who knows...
pezus said:
Don't know. The R is shaped like a stick. If it was one of the triggers, it would be shaped like a trigger |
360 controller has RS for a stick and RB for ashoulder button
Wii U Gamepad has an R for the right shoulder button, ZR for the right trigger.
You can press the right sitck on Wii U gamepad too, but I have no idea how it is listed, I havent played a game that utilises this yet.
pezus said: RS usually means to press the stick down, though. It's the button itself. R would be to move the stick. |
Now that could be it!
Quote Tree Killed - Conegamer
Bet with bluedawgs: I say Switch will outsell PS4 in 2018, he says PS4 will outsell Switch. He's now permabanned, but the bet will remain in my sig.
NNID: Slarvax - Steam: Slarvax - Friend Code: SW 7885-0552-5988
ethomaz said:
Some guys did pixel count in the image and it seems not to be PC because the resolution seems to be ~960p but who knows... |
Nah.
The image is 945p, but that's probably not the native res. Pixel counting only shows the image isn't upscaled to 945p. It most likely is PC.
JoeTheBro said: Nah. The image is 945p, but that's probably not the native res. Pixel counting only shows the image isn't upscaled to 945p. It most likely is PC. |
Not the image... the pixel counts shows it is not 1080 native because there aliasing that 1080p didn't give... it is below... something close to 960p.
ethomaz said:
Not the image... the pixel counts shows it is not 1080 native because there aliasing that 1080p didn't give... it is below... something close to 960p. |
That's not how it works. A 4k image downsampled to 945p could still have similar aliasing to this.