By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Which company is the most essential one for console gaming?

 

Which company is the most essential for console gaming?

Nintendo 453 49.08%
 
Sony 416 45.07%
 
Microsoft? 53 5.74%
 
Total:922
Areym on 27 March 2014

Certainly not microsoft.
It's a hard choice between Sony and Nintendo. I think the PlaySation brand is as popular, if not a bit less, than Nintendo. I would vote either one but I'll PS because, well, let's face it, i'm fucking biased as hell.



"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian

Around the Network
Areym on 27 March 2014
Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:
Nintendo cause without them, gaming wouldn't exist

Also, y isn't ouya on the list?

That's a rather bold statement. I think somewhere down the line, somebody else would have started taken its place.



"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian

Areym on 27 March 2014
Game_God said:
deskpro2k3 said:
Game_God said:
deskpro2k3 said:
I choose Sony because I grew out of saving princess Peach in Mario along time ago.


Too bad for you, I feel sorry for you random "serious" "grown-up" person... you should try growing out of sleeping as well, because when you sleep, you dream you know...


I don't need your pity.

Then you should read between the lines, I was not offering my pity, I was offering you matter for reflection in the form of a little jab in the n*tts, saying such "imature" stuff to "prove" that you are grown up does not serve you well. A mature person does not need videogames to validate their maturity or lack of it... remember you are playing games!

<a href="http://s234.photobucket.com/user/Kurtz60/media/Watch-out-we-got-a-badass-over-here-meme_zpsa3c3c3d9.png.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i234.photobucket.com/albums/ee178/Kurtz60/Watch-out-we-got-a-badass-over-here-meme_zpsa3c3c3d9.png" border="0" alt=" photo Watch-out-we-got-a-badass-over-here-meme_zpsa3c3c3d9.png"/></a>



"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian

Areym on 27 March 2014
TheLegendaryWolf said:

Nintendo, because Sony and Microsoft can be easily imitated by any other company when it comes to first party games.

Horse...shit. Nintendo's game aren't exactly the pinnacle of gaming innovation, granted they are extremely well made. 



"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian

coolguy on 27 March 2014

Iam a Sony fanboy ,lol but I will have to say Nintendo is essential for console gameing



VITA 32 GIG CARD.250 GIG SLIM & 160 GIG PHAT PS3

Around the Network
TheLegendaryWolf on 28 March 2014
Areym said:
TheLegendaryWolf said:

Nintendo, because Sony and Microsoft can be easily imitated by any other company when it comes to first party games.

Horse...shit. Nintendo's game aren't exactly the pinnacle of gaming innovation, granted they are extremely well made. 

I didn't mean it like that but in a sense of being iconic. For example, Sony has Knack, which nobody will remember well in say 5 years unless Knack 2 is successful. Im just saying a copying Mario would be alot less successful and much more dificult to imitate in a legal standpoint as well. Sony few decently known icons and Xbox got none besides Master Chief.



jibbyjackjoe on 28 March 2014

Nintendo. Sony puts out hardware, but the big N puts out fun.



Game_God on 28 March 2014
Areym said:
Game_God said:
deskpro2k3 said:
Game_God said:
deskpro2k3 said:
I choose Sony because I grew out of saving princess Peach in Mario along time ago.


Too bad for you, I feel sorry for you random "serious" "grown-up" person... you should try growing out of sleeping as well, because when you sleep, you dream you know...


I don't need your pity.

Then you should read between the lines, I was not offering my pity, I was offering you matter for reflection in the form of a little jab in the n*tts, saying such "imature" stuff to "prove" that you are grown up does not serve you well. A mature person does not need videogames to validate their maturity or lack of it... remember you are playing games!

 I'm not not badass, didn't you read my name???

 I'm GameGod, now kneel before me frail mortal!!!

My word is law!!!



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n29CicBxZuw

01001011 01101001 01110011 01110011 00100000 01101101 01111001 00100000 01110011 01101000 01101001 01101110 01111001 00100000 01101101 01100101 01110100 01100001 01101100 00100000 01100001 01110011 01110011 00100001

Areym on 28 March 2014
TheLegendaryWolf said:
Areym said:
TheLegendaryWolf said:

Nintendo, because Sony and Microsoft can be easily imitated by any other company when it comes to first party games.

Horse...shit. Nintendo's game aren't exactly the pinnacle of gaming innovation, granted they are extremely well made. 

I didn't mean it like that but in a sense of being iconic. For example, Sony has Knack, which nobody will remember well in say 5 years unless Knack 2 is successful. Im just saying a copying Mario would be alot less successful and much more dificult to imitate in a legal standpoint as well. Sony few decently known icons and Xbox got none besides Master Chief.

I really don't think that Knack is a copy of mario. Not every platform is a copy of mario, if that is what your are implying.

At the very least, you gotta see that Sony and MS are attempting to make iconic heroes for their respective brands. Nintendo stopped a long time, which is a little depressing. Nintendo has a lot but they were established way long ago, I can't think of any recent ones. Knack is failed attempt, we can all admit to that.



"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian

C64 on 28 March 2014
Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:
Nintendo cause without them, gaming wouldn't exist

Also, y isn't ouya on the list?

Nintendo in its early video gaming days just copied Atari. There was gaming before Nintendo and there will be gaming after Nintendo, they are just as replaceable as Sony or Microsoft. They are just a shadow of what they used to be anyway.