By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Angry Joe Titanfall review, SHOCKING 7/10

 

Are you getting Titanfall now?

Yes 100 19.65%
 
No 122 23.97%
 
I'm getting inFAMOUS: Second Son 285 55.99%
 
Total:507
trixiemafia86 on 19 March 2014
starcraft said:
trixiemafia86 said:
So Titanfall is a good game. but didn't turn out to be the game of the: week, month, quarter, year and generation. OK

Quite sure it was game of the week...and possibly quarter? lol

But it was never going to be game of the year! Destiny!!! And there are a couple of others that might surprise us!

Dark Souls II released same day ;)



Smartest nam evila

Current Platforms: HighendPC[rip]/PS4/PS3[rip]/Vita[rip]

Around the Network
Pibituh on 19 March 2014

It's an online only game, yet it misses some basic stuffs on multiplayer aspect! Makes it look like a rushed game ~
AngryJoe is actually being nice by giving it a 7 :)



ABTR on 19 March 2014

why this is shocking exacliy? is a review from a gamer who pay 60$ for 6vs6 multiplayer only game with no campaing with Bad AI minions with only 4 modes not unique at all and without leaderboards! I don't say the game is totaly bad the multiplayer has some awesome moments bad the lack of content make it repetitive and boring after a couple hours



 

 

J_Allard on 19 March 2014
deskpro2k3 said:
J_Allard said:
The biggest WTF is the general tone of the OP and the rest of the thread.

What about the OP tone you don't like? Let me guess. Its that I said don't fall for the hype, and don't believe the perfect 10/10 score when the game is lacking in many areas right? Look, many reviewers gave it 10/10 without mentioning the flaws. This is the problem, and this is what the thread is about. That is the thread main topic.

You yourself agree with most of the problems, but don't try to sugarcoat it like that. I mean you're doing exactly what those other reviewers did. lol

No I am talking about the way you make it seem as if the review and score are bad. A 7 from Angry Joe is not bad.

Also, maybe the flaws Joe found with the game, aren't flaws to other people? Or, at least, are not flaws worth detracting from the score? I mean hell you said yourself you'd give the game a 5 judging from Joe's review. Yet he gave it a 7. So apparently you can take those flaws, and he thinks they are worth 2 less points off the game than you do. So what can we learn from that?



Devil_Survivor on 19 March 2014

I am the only that thinks angry joe is a hack reviewer that doesn't tell anything you cant find out just by looking at the back of the box or the instruction manual?? Watch this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKgJzF3ZuYo
He's his jokes are lame and unfunny, he's inaccurate with information, does annoying and unnecessary hand motions(lol), and just seems to wan go work for IGN and be a corporate shill like the people there.



 

Around the Network
WagnerPaiva on 19 March 2014

Maybe when it is cheaper I will get it, the Beta was fun.



My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.

Pibituh on 19 March 2014
Devil_Survivor said:

I am the only that thinks angry joe is a hack reviewer that doesn't tell anything you cant find out just by looking at the back of the box or the instruction manual?? Watch this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKgJzF3ZuYo
He's his jokes are lame and unfunny, he's inaccurate with information, does annoying and unnecessary hand motions(lol), and just seems to wan go work for IGN and be a corporate shill like the people there.


I think he's unbiased. That's enough for me ~



Devil_Survivor on 19 March 2014
Pibituh said:
Devil_Survivor said:

I am the only that thinks angry joe is a hack reviewer that doesn't tell anything you cant find out just by looking at the back of the box or the instruction manual?? Watch this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKgJzF3ZuYo
He's his jokes are lame and unfunny, he's inaccurate with information, does annoying and unnecessary hand motions(lol), and just seems to wan go work for IGN and be a corporate shill like the people there.


I think he's unbiased. That's enough for me ~


Well I will give you he is probably better then anyone at the big websites :).



 

mibuokami on 19 March 2014

I don't mind this review, the score is not as relevant when you actually watched his review as he touched on the positive and negative of the game.

He scored this game down big time for a few glitch he encountered, its lack of single player campaign, the inability to setup private match and the online campaign being half arsed. All points I agree with despite loving the shit out of Titanfall.




DanneSandin on 19 March 2014

Yeah I like AJs reviews; he's always fair and gives in depths analysis about what's good and what's not. I'm just glad he finally got a PS as well to review games for!



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.