I love when you start make things up.

You don´t need all the whole  4 frames stored anywhere to calculate the movement vector, you don´t even need those pixel to have full color range. You can also work with blobs and other image artefacts other than each pixel movement vector. XOne BW is more than enouth to handle this situation, may be not in the exactly same way GG used on the PS4, but "temporal upscale" is not much more demanding than "spatial upscale".

It not work like that... you are working in a eSRAM frame buffer and so you need to go to DDR3 to read/write information while you work with it... in PS4 you already have theses India in the main RAM... in Xbone not... you have addictional read/write cycles not found on PS4... you are using Xbone bandwidth to others things like textures for example and you need to travel everything between main RAM and eSRAM... so add more these tasks will compromises and at the end devs will need to sacrifices something.

This won't work on Xbone for native 1080p framebuffer... maybe 720p or 900p that is not what people here are expecting.

As always, you are talking out of your ass. You don't know how it works, and say whatever makes you feel better. Of course this is an incremental thing, as you have a bandwith pool you work with, but you should take into consideration that "creating" the 960x1080 frame is tons more bandwidth intensive than reading - writting three 960 x 1080 textures.

A LIE is a LIE. I bashed albert penallo for lying about RYSE resolution. Now its time for guerrilla games time.

There is almost no demand to upscale a framebuffer... any weak CPU do that with videos on Cellphones without trouble... this tech is demanding... it is not like a 1080p native reader but it is demanding.

And Xbone BW is a limitation to work with it unless you didn't use the BW to render the game lol.

I think it's a great technique and should be used in all graphically challenging games. It's too bad you can't quite categorize it. It's not really a lower resolution as there is nothing scaled up and it's not quite half the frames.
Looks to me like the perfect compromise between resolution and framerate.

No. I'm talking abou what I already worked on... you are assumptions no other work is being done and using the DDR3 while you have to deal with these storage past frames outside the eSRAM... a hint whilee you are working with the actual framebuffer the GPU is already processing the new one using the DDR BW in parallel... it is not the GPU is just doing the predictions for the actual framebuffer or post-processing and not working in the results for the new framebuffer... or the DDR3 BW is not being used.

I can bet with you this tech won't be used to reach 1080p on Xbone because they can't.

So you have been developing an XB1 game? Interesting.

Anybody gonna tell me what other game has used this technique? And why they did it in the first place if the PS4 should be able to handle Native 1920x1080?

No... you sound like you never worked with GPUs and bandwidth on PC.

But of course... Xbone have a magical secret sauce that makes the impossible possible... I think you are reading so much mixterxmedia's blog.