| TheJimbo1234 said:
Sifting through tin hats and paid trolls is hard, but actual reports where they track the IPs do confirm that it is buisnesses spamming news websites across Europe.
Also Russia is known to be terrible for propoganda, but it is amazing how quickly people forget these things. I think a lot of people are scared of realising that there is a large, somewhat powerful and unstable country about and instead come up with crazy excuses which helps them to sleep better.
|
The mythology about Russia at your place is least of my concerns. I understand you consider yourself an "independent thinker", but quite a big chunk of completely brain-washed people think of themselves a bit too much then they actually deserve.
| TheJimbo1234 said:
Actually certain missiles work on causing a blast of shrapnel rather than pressure or an explosion.
|
Like what? R-60 AAM warhead is equipped with typical HE continuous rods, aka a shrapnel.
| TheJimbo1234 said:
The wreck had the classic damage of a BUK and the blackbox confirmed this as much as it could.
|
Do we have blacbox recordings released to the public? No. So what has been confirmed so far? Nothing. Even that'd be SAM, I repeat Ukrainians are the only ones who had Buks in there and they were active at the time plane was downed.
| TheJimbo1234 said:
A BUK can reach out to heigher alttitudes and does not have a transponder reciever....so would be, again, utterly plausible to do something like this.
|
Why would SAM have a transponder receiver? O_o The only confirmed SAM systems that rebels had at their disposal at the time were MANPADs or MTLB-based Strela-10, which if effecitvely a set of MANPADs with radar. They have the same ceiling of about 4km. The only Buk they had is captured Ukrainian launch pad, which is not nearly enough to successfully downing anything even if it was operational and missile was operational too, besides a launch pad you'd need a targeting radar and a command post.
| TheJimbo1234 said:
And before anyone says "Ukr jets!", MH17 and traffic control would have logged the movements of unidentifed planes, diverted planes etc. Occam's razer/common sense all says it is a rebel missile which was gifted from the Russians, and that is before you look at the mountain of evidence pointing to the rebels afterwards.
|
All recordings of the air traffic control in the airport of Borispol, that has been tracking MH17 at the time, were confiscated by SBU at the day of the crash:
"Ukraine's SBU security service has confiscated recordings of conversations between Ukrainian air traffic control officers and the crew of the doomed airliner, a source in Kiev has told Interfax news agency."
Since then nobody ever heard about them. But military ELINT units have recorded the presence of military jet there.
Is there anything else I could shed a light on to help you remember all circumstances of the MH17 crash? I'm asking because I'm growing tired of the discussion, as Sharu have said it -- nobody cares by now and more importantly nobody remembers what was a year ago.