| TheJimbo1234 said:
You are joking or another paid Kremlin troll (and yes, it is a known fact that Putin is paying for people to spam websites with pro Russian nonesne). Why would Ukaraine shoot down a plane? They wanted to cripple their currency and economy even more by drawing attention to themselves? Because that makes more sense then some idiot rebels not knowing how to use an AA system properly. Oh, and the investigation by Denmark has be public so what coverup? Plus why would Boeing investigate it? Does Ford investigate car crashes? Never mind though. I'm sure Putin will make sure everyone who is against him will either be annexed, attacked by "rebels", or shot on a bridge. |
He is not, I am :D Oh, Jesus, and I remember times when the "Putin's trolls" meme first appeared abroad somewhere around 2008. I'm not sure but it was smth yellowish and British, Daily Mail probably? What take you so long, conspiracy nut? Though as someone who was supposed to be paid (even though fired shortly after) for writing crap in Interent in 2011-12 just before presedential elections I could suggest that if paid anti-Putin trolls like me have existed, paid pro-Putin trolls might actually exists as well.
So what about that crash? Almost a year has passed, where're the results? Don't you think if the media, that blamed Putin personally so vigorously, wouldn't take opportunity to blame him again if there was a slightest chance to do so? As expected results are virtually nothing.
I beleive I've shared quite a few words on the availability and operatiblity of the AA systems rebels have at the time. Nothing points to the fact they had a techincal ability to shot it down.
As for the reasons, I guess they are the same as with any other false flag attack. I've seen quite a lot of similar provocations throughtout that war with civilians deathtolls. Not every one of them has reached the western media (and quite a lot could be said solely on the grounds if the given event even made it to the headlines). Not every one of them I've studied in details to speak for sure, except one for which I've collected all information that was freely available and put eveyrthing on the location's map -- and have come to conclusion that shelling of Mariuopol was either a mistake or a purposeful provocation by the Ukrainian Forces or that neo-Nazi Azov "batalion" (here're these junkies) -- the official number of victims is currently at 31. Given this, multiple other similar events, undoubtful faking of "evidences" like infamouse audiotape, I somehow readily believe that one way or antoher some of current Ukrainian authorities has laid her hand on this. Of course they would never do this from approval or even help from the Washnigton.
