By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Wolfenstein: The New Order runs at 1080p/60FPS on PS4. XBONE well...

Skeeuk on 26 February 2014

has anyone seen the gameplay footage?



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

Around the Network
kirby007 on 26 February 2014
eFKac said:
selnor1983 said:
kirby007 said:
selnor1983 said:
Im not surprised. Bethesda was one of the devs at launch to talk about the Poor SDK and bottleneck of the 32 mb ESRAM.

They are also saying the new SDK makes the ESRAM issue for Resolution basically a non issue.

PS4 version was already announced 1080p/60. I reckon the reason they waited to say the Xbox One version was because they were implementing the SDK ESRAM efficiencies. Making sure the new SDK did as promised, before announcing it.

So no tis doesn't surprise those of us who actually listened to the developers on why Xbox One res was lower at launch titles.


quoting for more exposure, this is a very important post

Agree.

But the new arguement will be and has already been seen - " Its a cross gen game, hardly surprising. "

All the while forgetting Ghosts was a cross gen game and looked significantly worde visually than Wolfenstein. And yet Ghosts was 720p on Xbox One.

Because remember, where Xbox One is concerned we have to NOT believe developers but believe 50% bro.


Ohh yussss we're back in the PS4 power is meaningless time once again.

It will be glorious! Can't wait for the truth to come out as the poet said!

very short sighted response, since neither selnor or I say that anywhere



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

rolltide101x on 26 February 2014
kirby007 said:
Suppose you have an insane good pc which can run crysis 4, but your os is fucked by a virus or whatever complication, the game won't run aswell as when the os would be 100%

and yes this can affect performance very very much


There it requires WAY more power to render 1080p 60 FPS than 720p and 60 FPS. There is no way that it was that unoptimized.

 

Xbox One has viruses confirmed?



shloob on 26 February 2014

Id tech 5 isn't 10 years old it's first game rage released in 2011



kirby007 on 26 February 2014
rolltide101x said:
kirby007 said:
Suppose you have an insane good pc which can run crysis 4, but your os is fucked by a virus or whatever complication, the game won't run aswell as when the os would be 100%

and yes this can affect performance very very much


There it requires WAY more power to render 1080p 60 FPS than 720p and 60 FPS. There is no way that it was that unoptimized.

 

Xbox One has viruses confirmed?

you could see a unoptimized SDK having the same infuence as a virus or something like that : affecting performance alot.....



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

Around the Network
rolltide101x on 26 February 2014
kirby007 said:
rolltide101x said:
kirby007 said:
Suppose you have an insane good pc which can run crysis 4, but your os is fucked by a virus or whatever complication, the game won't run aswell as when the os would be 100%

and yes this can affect performance very very much


There it requires WAY more power to render 1080p 60 FPS than 720p and 60 FPS. There is no way that it was that unoptimized.

 

Xbox One has viruses confirmed?

you could see a unoptimized SDK having the same infuence as a virus or something like that : affecting performance alot.....

I was being sarcastic obviously but I am just saying there is no way that the SDK was so noptimized it will take it from 720p 60 FPS to 1080p 60 FPS. 32 MBs of ram is just not enough to run graphic intensive games at 1080p and 60 FPS.



kirby007 on 26 February 2014
rolltide101x said:
kirby007 said:
rolltide101x said:
kirby007 said:
Suppose you have an insane good pc which can run crysis 4, but your os is fucked by a virus or whatever complication, the game won't run aswell as when the os would be 100%

and yes this can affect performance very very much


There it requires WAY more power to render 1080p 60 FPS than 720p and 60 FPS. There is no way that it was that unoptimized.

 

Xbox One has viruses confirmed?

you could see a unoptimized SDK having the same infuence as a virus or something like that : affecting performance alot.....

I was being sarcastic obviously but I am just saying there is no way that the SDK was so noptimized it will take it from 720p 60 FPS to 1080p 60 FPS. 32 MBs of ram is just not enough to run graphic intensive games at 1080p and 60 FPS.

if the difference between the pervious SDK and new SDK is easier tiling? then you are wrong



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

mutantsushi on 26 February 2014
LivingMetal said:
Gameplay is all that matters. 720p is good enough. No one is going to notice the difference. 1080p is overkill. Waste of resources. Piss poor development.

Waste of what resources? 

You don't need to expend any resources on making a game 1080p vs. 720p, just as PC games can be set to output at any resolution you choose.



Zekkyou on 26 February 2014
VitroBahllee said:
RJ_Sizzle said:
Did they say the magic word, "natively"?


The PR person knew what question was being asked. This hope that, because they didn't expressly SAY 'native,' that it might not be is pretty sad. You honestly hoping that the console you don't own can't match the resolution and frame rate of your own console?

The PS4 crowd have been so happy about the resolution disparity that they are not going to know what to do with themselves when all new X1 games are being released on that new SDK that better utiliizes the ESRAM to give 1080p in every title. Just enjoy it while it lasts, I guess. Or enjoy something more rational than a slight resolution disparity in launch window titles between two competing consoles.

The PS4 fans will be just as happy as always :P The PS4 is still a decent chunk more powerful than the X1, that hasn't changed.



mutantsushi on 26 February 2014

Of coures resolution and frame rate are not the whole picture.
GPU resources that can support higher stats in those areas can also support higher AA and other graphics features.
Even the most incompetent dev around would have to PURPOSEFULLY FAIL to not get more out of a stronger GPU.