EricFabian said:
Just your opinion.
1.1 - "Some of you may tell that companies are meant to make profits and thus it’s totally legitimate for Nintendo to make billions at the gamer’s expense. That is true. However, you as a gamer have the power to choose. If there are companies that have been willing to give you as much as you give them, you can opt by them and make the market to operate on this logic. That is also fair".
Your opinion. When you buy a game, you buy a game. Nobody cares if Microsoft or Sony or Nintendo will be happy with my purchase. If I bought a game is because I just want to play it. Sony, Microsoft or Nintendo owe nothing to me. I bought because I want, because I like it. End.
|
My opinion when I say what exactly? Please specify as I can't find one single sentence on that quote that is an opinion.
EricFabian said:
1.2 - You use so many times the word "complex". Just because Nintendo games are not "photo realistics" does NOT mean they aren't "complex". Smash Bros has a gameplay years ahead of Mortal Kombat or Tekken, you like or not. And what about sports? And cartoonish thing? A game don't need to be gray and have 500 blood barrels to be "complex". I love to kill some people on CoD sometimes, but is funny and "complex" just biuld my city on Animal Crossing.
|
Where did I say that complexity and photo-realism are the same thing? And when you say "Smash Bros has a gameplay years ahead of Mortal Kombat or Tekken, you like or not" that is nothing more than an opinion. Got ya! 
It seems you are coming with opinions, not me.
EricFabian said:
1.3 - So many assumptions here that I'm going to skip
|
Then skip it. Don't bother writing that. Either you really skip it or you criticize it with evidence.
EricFabian said:
1.4 - If you wasted your time searching like you said you probably knew about the crash in 1984, so pointless.
2.1 - Yes, you never made a research. Go and read something about the crash.
|
What has the crash of 1983 to do with Nintendo's bad policies towards gamers and developers? How does one thing justify the other?
EricFabian said:
I just have to lol at this. Sony, Microsoft, EA, Ubisoft etc do the same thing. Deal with it.
|
No, they do drop the price of their consoles and games like Nintendo doesn't.
As for the dirty moves, please list me the ones from each one of them and let's see if they can even be a half of Nintendo's.
EricFabian said:
2.2 - I agree that using nini-dvds and cartriges was stupid, but "Sony and Microsoft have always attempted to develop powerful consoles using mainstream hardware tech that could please and be accessible to as many 3rd parties as possible, which could aim for protagonism within the console. Actually, Sony and Microsoft enhanced it, providing good software development tools and eventually financing some projects if they were to be exclusives. Their philosophy was: “if we develop the best system for 3rd party developers, it can’t be bad for our 1st party studios”. No man, just no. PS2, PS3 and original Xbox want to talk with you.
|
You talk to me. Evidence, please.
EricFabian said:
And using anonymous source and saying Wii was safe, you just make sure nobody take you serious.
|
What?
EricFabian said:
2.3 - No.
2.4 - No again
3.1 and on - Just your opinion, everything useless and no facts.
|
Again, don't bother writing that. Either you skip it or you criticize it with evidence.
Prediction made in 14/01/2014 for 31/12/2020: PS4: 100M XOne: 70M WiiU: 25M
Prediction made in 01/04/2016 for 31/12/2020: PS4: 100M XOne: 50M WiiU: 18M
Prediction made in 15/04/2017 for 31/12/2020: PS4: 90M XOne: 40M WiiU: 15M Switch: 20M
Prediction made in 24/03/2018 for 31/12/2020: PS4: 110M XOne: 50M WiiU: 14M Switch: 65M