"When you take away what makes this console superior, it's clearly unremarkable." - Khan 

lol I remember that.

Well the X1 can handle 1080p, but that often deters 60 fps.

But lets not ignore PS4 often struggles to achieve 1080p with 60 fps as well. Even if it does it more often than the X1.

Cause I don't think-man

I said "usually". Of course it can technically handle 1080p. I believe even X360 can handle 1080p. WiiU can handle 1080p. We know Forza 5 is 1080p, which I saw with my bare eyes. That's not the point. It depends on the game, and the amount of information that needs to be put on screen. 32 MB is TOO LITTLE. This is why only a few non-demanding  sports game (which have only certain number 3d models on the screen as well as cartoonish crowd) and racing games (with 2d backgrounds and a fast paced game with little attention to environmental details) are 1080p on XB1 while the poster child games such as Dead Rising, Ryse, and Titanfall, which are all sub1080p.

Because you implied it.

Remember that time you focused on pixels instead of graphics and performance?

Lastly, if the X1 was closer to Wii U in graphics... the X1 would get games that look like Wii U running at a higher resolution. Not PS4 games running at a lower resolution.

Isnt it pretty obvious which one is closer though?  Arent you a developer?  Cant you look at the specs and know?  You should know, especially since every developer and their dog has been saying that the two systems were close from the start.  

I don't think so, but I think it's becoming pretty apparent that Microsoft followed Nintendo's lead and bundled their console with a peripheral that accounts for a substantial amount of the cost of the sku that they have on the market. Looking at their current models, the Wii U costs $299.00 ( down from $350.00 which is probably costing them a substantial amount on each unit sold, they probably knocked $50.00 off th price of the gamepad in order to sell more units ) but I think they would be hard pressed to confirm that $200.00 of that is actually for the tech the Wii U itself has under the hood.

Similarly with Xbox One, you probably have a console that's at best a $300 to $350 dollar console under the hood with Kinect 2.0 accounting for $150 to $200 of the current SKU's retail price of $500.00.

I think with Playstation 4 that it's pretty apparent that you actually get a console that has $400 worth of tech under the hood.

And I think it's so apparent that even this outspoken Xbox youtube supporter ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRdHUNpFGpw&list=UU3CH2i9rJ24NuJ9ruX5RvAw ) is coming to same conclusion.

You can't just grab arbitrary numbers and compare CPU's like that.
PowerPC and Jaguar have completely different instructions sets, different cache sizes, cache speeds, cache associativity, different branch predictors, different extensions, different front and back end widths and different interconnect bandwidths, amongst other things.
It's far less black and white than what you would imply.

The only time you can compare a processor of the same clockspeed is when it's the same architecture or when it's a derivative of such. (This was a lesson people learn't the hard way during the Pentium 4 and Pentium D era's, how short some peoples memories must be.)

As for the GPU's, the WiiU is based upon the VLIW5 architecture which is an architecture that is not as effecient as Graphics Core Next in any metric when dealing with modern games, using GFLOPS to again, compare GPU's of different architectures is the wrong way to go about it, the disparity between the Xbox One and Wii U's GPU is far larger than the numbers imply.

Simply put, the Xbox one is more effecient per "gigaflop/mhz/ghz" than the WiiU and it's an advantage shared by the Playstation 4.

The Xbox One, like the Playstation 3 and 4 and the Xbox 360 as well as Wii U can run games at 1080P@60fps just fine.

However, there is a massive demand for ever-improving-graphics from consumers, developers meet that by making sacrifices in an area to bolster another.
One of the first to go is generally the resolution and framerate.

No. Yes. No. You still consider the XBONE and PS4 close?