By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JoeTheBro said:
Mr Puggsly said:
JoeTheBro said:

Obviously this only applies when the games have comparable graphics.

Take Ghosts for example. Ignoring image quality and just focusing on the rendered scene the XBONE port looks better but it's fair to say that both are somewhat close.

Wii U Ghosts: 880X720 or 633,600 pixels

XBONE Ghosts: 1280X720 or 921,600 pixels

PS4 Ghosts: 1920X1080 or 2,073,600 pixels

There's nothing wrong with making this comparison.

There is nothing wrong with making that comparison, but its fair to say its a worthless comparison because there is more to graphics than resolution.

It completely ignores the superior graphics and frame rate of the X1 port. That's ignoring important details to spin your argument.

A PC game running at 720p with low graphic settings is not equal to running that same game on 720p with high graphics settings.

 

BF4 looks significantly better than CoD and achieves 60 fps, but for your comparison we have to ignore it because the Wii U didn't get its 7th gen quality port.

I mentioned that. See the bolded. Unlike COD and BF4, is there a night and day difference between the Wii U and XBONE ports when ignoring image quality? They look really close to me. Also I didn't know the Wii U port hovered around 40fps. That's a mistake on my part.

@Fatslob I'd go with pugsly's point too, that's why I said it

"When you take away what makes this console superior, it's clearly unremarkable." - Khan