By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Are XBONE graphics closer to Wii U than PS4?

Pemalite said:
JoeTheBro said:
Pemalite said:
JoeTheBro said:
brendude13 said:

I was being sarcastic.

I know, but you're also correct.


The Wii U has several titles running at 1080P.
Wii U as powerfull as the PS4 confirmed?

Obviously this only applies when the games have comparable graphics.

Take Ghosts for example. Ignoring image quality and just focusing on the rendered scene the XBONE port looks better but it's fair to say that both are somewhat close.

Wii U Ghosts: 880X720 or 633,600 pixels

XBONE Ghosts: 1280X720 or 921,600 pixels

PS4 Ghosts: 1920X1080 or 2,073,600 pixels

There's nothing wrong with making this comparison.


You missed the sarcasm I think.
Resolution and framerates are obviously not a definitive conclusion of graphics, there is so much more that goes on to render a scene and using a a cross generational game with an aging game engine is not an accurate representation of what this generation is going to be like, it's laughable to even consider that.

With that in mind, I enjoy 7680x1440 gaming which is 11,059,200 pixels. Or roughly 5.3X better than the PS4.

Lets not forget that the Xbox One has superior geometry performance over the WiiU too, something which I wholeheatedly beleive we will see a big push this generation as consoles have finally caught up with 2 year old (Going on 3 years old in a mere 10 months) mid-range PC hardware.

Ahhh it brings back memories of those terrible evergreen tessellators ...



Around the Network

If the power gap is closer to the Wii U, that REALLY won't bode well for the PS4 AT ALL. I hope it isn't as weak as the OP suggests. 



No. Nintendo does have a console which can push out some great visuals, but the X1 is simply a better piece of tech.



Pemalite said:

 All your games are belong to us.


Well, I still have my base a least.



PS4 and X1 looking pretty much the same.

WiiU looks good but not X1 good.



Around the Network
JoeTheBro said:
jlmurph2 said:
Well this thread was pointless.


It's pointless because the first 4 people responding disagree? Give it time.


Make that 5....

This thread is stupid



Yay!!!

I don't think fans of Nintendo consoles of late are interested in SPECS, am I wrong? Nintendo brings more of a unique gaming experience (not referring to flailing arms, btw), in my opinion...



Ohh yeah, I herd a game in WiiU haz 200 fps.

WiiU >>>>> Ps4 Confirmed?



Yay!!!

gergroy said:
JoeTheBro said:

With the recent news that MGS:GZ is 720p 60fps on the XBONE, is anyone else starting to feel that the system is closer in terms of graphics to the Wii U than the PS4? There's certainly a large gap between the XBONE and Wii U, no one is denying that, but the gap between the PS4 and XBONE appears even larger. I'm certainly thinking so.


Really?  Do you actually believe that?  Or are you just trying to be controversial?

I don't know if it is, but I do believe it could be. It's certainly not as crazy of a question as most people act.

 

As far as being controversial goes, yeah after re-reading my op I can see why you'd think that. It's not a negative to the XBONE as much as it's a positive to the Wii U and PS4. The Wii U is A LOT stronger than most people believe and the PS4 is exceeding some people's expectations too. Say Wii U was three times stronger than PS3, XBONE was six times stronger than PS3, and PS4 was 12 times stronger than PS3. In that hypothetical situation the XBONE is evenly placed between the two. Those numbers probably sound wrong to most people, but do they sound absurd? I don't think so. It's definitely worth a discussion.



JoeTheBro said:

Obviously this only applies when the games have comparable graphics.

Take Ghosts for example. Ignoring image quality and just focusing on the rendered scene the XBONE port looks better but it's fair to say that both are somewhat close.

Wii U Ghosts: 880X720 or 633,600 pixels

XBONE Ghosts: 1280X720 or 921,600 pixels

PS4 Ghosts: 1920X1080 or 2,073,600 pixels

There's nothing wrong with making this comparison.

There is nothing wrong with making that comparison, but its fair to say its a worthless comparison because there is more to graphics than resolution.

It completely ignores the superior graphics and frame rate of the X1 port. That's ignoring important details to spin your argument.

A PC game running at 720p with low graphic settings is not equal to running that same game on 720p with high graphics settings.

 

BF4 looks significantly better than CoD and achieves 60 fps, but for your comparison we have to ignore it because the Wii U didn't get its 7th gen quality port.



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)