Pemalite said:
|
Ahhh it brings back memories of those terrible evergreen tessellators ...
Pemalite said:
|
Ahhh it brings back memories of those terrible evergreen tessellators ...
If the power gap is closer to the Wii U, that REALLY won't bode well for the PS4 AT ALL. I hope it isn't as weak as the OP suggests.
No. Nintendo does have a console which can push out some great visuals, but the X1 is simply a better piece of tech.
Pemalite said: All your games are belong to us. |
Well, I still have my base a least.
PS4 and X1 looking pretty much the same.
WiiU looks good but not X1 good.
JoeTheBro said:
|
Make that 5....
This thread is stupid
Yay!!!
I don't think fans of Nintendo consoles of late are interested in SPECS, am I wrong? Nintendo brings more of a unique gaming experience (not referring to flailing arms, btw), in my opinion...
Ohh yeah, I herd a game in WiiU haz 200 fps.
WiiU >>>>> Ps4 Confirmed?
Yay!!!
gergroy said:
|
I don't know if it is, but I do believe it could be. It's certainly not as crazy of a question as most people act.
As far as being controversial goes, yeah after re-reading my op I can see why you'd think that. It's not a negative to the XBONE as much as it's a positive to the Wii U and PS4. The Wii U is A LOT stronger than most people believe and the PS4 is exceeding some people's expectations too. Say Wii U was three times stronger than PS3, XBONE was six times stronger than PS3, and PS4 was 12 times stronger than PS3. In that hypothetical situation the XBONE is evenly placed between the two. Those numbers probably sound wrong to most people, but do they sound absurd? I don't think so. It's definitely worth a discussion.
JoeTheBro said: Obviously this only applies when the games have comparable graphics. Take Ghosts for example. Ignoring image quality and just focusing on the rendered scene the XBONE port looks better but it's fair to say that both are somewhat close. Wii U Ghosts: 880X720 or 633,600 pixels XBONE Ghosts: 1280X720 or 921,600 pixels PS4 Ghosts: 1920X1080 or 2,073,600 pixels There's nothing wrong with making this comparison. |
There is nothing wrong with making that comparison, but its fair to say its a worthless comparison because there is more to graphics than resolution.
It completely ignores the superior graphics and frame rate of the X1 port. That's ignoring important details to spin your argument.
A PC game running at 720p with low graphic settings is not equal to running that same game on 720p with high graphics settings.
BF4 looks significantly better than CoD and achieves 60 fps, but for your comparison we have to ignore it because the Wii U didn't get its 7th gen quality port.
Recently Completed:
River City: Rival Showdown for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)