NJ5 said: This article makes some fine points against downloads, but it doesn't make any in favor of Blu-Ray. Specifically, it doesn't tell us how/when it will take over DVD. The transition from VHS to DVD doesn't count, since the advantages of that transition were enormous, while the advantages of Blu-Ray over DVD are minimal. |
The fact is that there are a lot of people who won't notice the difference between a BD and a DVD. They won't care, they won't want to pay more. Even given consumers with a BD player and an HDTV, you'd still find that DVD sales would likely continue to dominate.
The rise of IPTV type downloading is inevitable. I'm not talking about completely supplanting disc formats, but competing with and even possibly surpassing them within a decade. The question isn't if, it's when -- when will the technology get there.
We have plenty of examples of it getting there -- 10mbit cable is fast enough for well compressed HD content. Verizon FiOS is 100mbit or faster. There are a lot of developed and developing technologies becoming available to more people that will provide download speeds faster than BD streaming to the home. As infrastructure upgrades, companies will rush to monetize this opportunity. And the biggest facet of that will be IPTV / HD movies on demand.
People will think of movie consumption in a different way. They won't think "I need to go to the store and buy a movie," but rather they'll think, "when I get home, I will push a button on my TV/set top box and watch a movie." It's quicker, it's easier, and it's the same movie. That's how it will get adopted.