| SubiyaCryolite said: This is getting sad |
It was sad before this thread was made. Nintendo is important, everyone saying otherwise are kidding themselves.
The front page of VGC is pure evidence for this.
Is Nintendo important? | |||
| Yes, they are. | 133 | 82.61% | |
| No, they are not. | 22 | 13.66% | |
| Total: | 155 | ||
| SubiyaCryolite said: This is getting sad |
It was sad before this thread was made. Nintendo is important, everyone saying otherwise are kidding themselves.
The front page of VGC is pure evidence for this.
MOST IMPORTANT!!!!!!
Zelda - Breath of the Wild for Nintendo Switch.... Incredable!!!

Well it's certainly appreciated that you take the time to elaborate this list!
Nintendo is important, they are one of the most successful videogame companies, there is not a lot of room to downplay Nintendo's impact and importance in the industry.
"I've Underestimated the Horse Power from Mario Kart 8, I'll Never Doubt the WiiU's Engine Again"
Is that actually Boogie himself?
Underrated youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjfV8aKrUfC0wwtCypieUUA
| fps_d0minat0r said: lol 'they will drop it as the fps craze goes away' |
u musst be young if u dont remember the powerglove. and i would count lightguns as motioncontrols too.
same goes for 3d, its a old old dream, so many tried it. but it just never worked well enough.
motion controls and fps arnt the same anyway, on is a technologie the other is a gamegenre
fps are old too, thats right, but they arnt the same anymore. and i would call the genre a shadow of former greatness. the technologie improved, but the games didnt, the games are getting worse every year. the sales mb doesnt look so bad, but that doesnt mean anything
| TornadoCreator said: OK, first of all, video games are not toys. A toy by definition is for imaginative play with no goal. In fact, this smug "video games are toys" rebuttal that's started circling the internet to try to counter people who take video games "too seriously" is both irritating and incorrect. |
Can you source this dichotomous key you use? I'll make a more semantic argument.
Here is the etymology of the word "toy." This seems to verify the use of the word "toy" as a counter to "serious" gamers.
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=toy
c.1300, "amorous playing, sport," later "piece of fun or entertainment" (c.1500), "thing of little value, trifle" (1520s), and "thing for a child to play with" (1580s). Of uncertain origin, and there may be more than one word here. Cf. Middle Dutch toy, Dutch tuig "tools, apparatus, stuff, trash," in speeltuig "play-toy, plaything;" German Zeug "stuff, matter, tools," Spielzeug "plaything, toy;" Danish tøi, Swedish tyg "stuff, gear."
And if we look at the modern definiton in the Webster and Oxford dictionaries.
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/words/the-oxford-english-dictionary
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/toy
: something a child plays with
: something that an adult buys or uses for enjoyment or entertainment
: something that is very small
Are they important., yes. Why? They have the most fanatics for a reason.
Are they indispensable? No. Why? Many of us do just fine without them
These are different questions.
"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)
"WAR is a racket. It always has been.
It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler
| TornadoCreator said: OK, first of all, video games are not toys. A toy by definition is for imaginative play with no goal. In fact, this smug "video games are toys" rebuttal that's started circling the internet to try to counter people who take video games "too seriously" is both irritating and incorrect. |
There is nothing 'smug' about calling video games 'toys'. They ARE toys.
A toy by definition is:
noun ˈtȯi
: something a child plays with
: something that an adult buys or uses for enjoyment or entertainment
| WagnerPaiva said: You gotta calm down buddy, you get irritated outta of almost nothing. These are all toys in my book:
|
I'm perfectly calm; your belief that you can decern tone or irritation from writing on the internet is precious though. As for the rest of your post... congratulations, in your book they're all toys, pity you're book isn't the standard everyone else uses, you're still wrong.
> Complains about fanboyism
> Proceeds to make tons of flame-baiting fanboy arguments
Yeah, acting like people who criticize Nintendo are just 12 year old COD players doesn't help your argument very much. Your thread comes off as far more "fanboyish" than the one it was made in response to.
And NO company is important enough to have to exist in this industry--not Nintendo, not Sony, not Microsoft, or any existing publishers or developers. There will always be a demand for video games, and there will always be new companies to make them if the old ones go under. It's the same with any industry that makes products people want.