By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Any console converts here? And why?

fps_d0minat0r on 12 January 2014
Pemalite said:
fps_d0minat0r said:


youre moving the goal posts, the discussion was that you said PC games are cheaper than PS+ but you cant prove it with a direct comparison, now out of desperation your listing free games which are free because they are not AAA standard.

PS+ offers AAA games and SOME indie games. Humble bundle is mostly indie games and SOME AAA games every now and then. even then when the origin bundle came out, PS+ already had games like crysis 2, BF3 and dead space 2 before it.

Ill admit it, if you only have $6 and are gaming for 1 month, the origin bundle was a better deal in that specific month compared to PS+, but gamers are not gamers for a month. If you cant prove it in the long term then dont even bother.

As for the modding hacker and cracker community im sure they will get past the authentication servers, but at the same time im also sure they will make PS3 emulators.

with mods you might have a point but if I have hundreds of PS+ AAA games waiting that are official games and polished by expert developers, why would I play some unfinished unpolished work made by some guy in his basement?


I'm not moving the goal posts. You asked for quantity for the price of a PS+ subscription, I gave you that and more, you're simply not happy with the answer.

And I laugh at you if you think some of those free games aren't AAA rated.
One of them has more registered players than exists on the entire Playstation or Xbox Live networks.


lol "AAA rated" - thats the only thing to laugh about.

AAA refers to a game with high budgets.

Ive seen games made by 2 men get high ratings, that doesnt make them AAA. That just makes them good indie games which most people apart from critics dont care about.

and registered users doesnt mean much if they dont play the game. Get me a stat where people have put more hours into humble bundle games than PS+ games and I will believe it.

And like I said, if you want these top games like borderlands 2, DmC, ME3, sleeping dogs, hitman absolution, catherine, xcom, BF3, saints row, spec ops the line, AC 3, far cry 3, MGS revengence, grid 2, bioshock infinite, batman arham city, they might show up on the humble bundle later but you still have to pay the average which is mostly more than a month of PS+ on average.

I know a lot of people that just buy games because they are cheap but dont even play a fraction of them because they have no interest. on PS+ you are getting mostly popular games and the odd indie game every now and then, or when a new platform launches (like when vita and PS4 launched).



Around the Network
Pemalite on 12 January 2014
fps_d0minat0r said:


lol "AAA rated" - thats the only thing to laugh about.

AAA refers to a game with high budgets.

Ive seen games made by 2 men get high ratings, that doesnt make them AAA. That just makes them good indie games which most people apart from critics dont care about.

and registered users doesnt mean much if they dont play the game. Get me a stat where people have put more hours into humble bundle games than PS+ games and I will believe it.

And like I said, if you want these top games like borderlands 2, DmC, ME3, sleeping dogs, hitman absolution, catherine, xcom, BF3, saints row, spec ops the line, AC 3, far cry 3, MGS revengence, grid 2, bioshock infinite, batman arham city, they might show up on the humble bundle later but you still have to pay the average which is mostly more than a month of PS+ on average.

I know a lot of people that just buy games because they are cheap but dont even play a fraction of them because they have no interest. on PS+ you are getting mostly popular games and the odd indie game every now and then, or when a new platform launches (like when vita and PS4 launched).


League of Legends is a AAA game. It has over 1,000 staff working on it, you think that's cheap and easy?



You're still sidetracking the origional point of all this. I'll just quote you so you can't refute it. (Stop moving the goal posts to suit your own agenda and move the argument into other facets so that you can pretend you aren't proven wrong.)

fps_d0minat0r said:


Yh I can understand why it sucks to pay to go online compulsory especially if it isnt your main system, but if you were to spend £40 on PC and/or wii U, would you get as many games as you would in a year from PS+?

And the answer was a YES. You can get many more games for the same price, end of discussion, proof was provided in prior posts, that's all folks, nothing else to see here.




www.youtube.com/@Pemalite

IsawYoshi on 12 January 2014

I'll stay with Nintendo, only thing tempting me to go to another system is Ratchet and Clank, Sly and TES. Tha's not enough.



fps_d0minat0r on 12 January 2014
Pemalite said:
fps_d0minat0r said:


lol "AAA rated" - thats the only thing to laugh about.

AAA refers to a game with high budgets.

Ive seen games made by 2 men get high ratings, that doesnt make them AAA. That just makes them good indie games which most people apart from critics dont care about.

and registered users doesnt mean much if they dont play the game. Get me a stat where people have put more hours into humble bundle games than PS+ games and I will believe it.

And like I said, if you want these top games like borderlands 2, DmC, ME3, sleeping dogs, hitman absolution, catherine, xcom, BF3, saints row, spec ops the line, AC 3, far cry 3, MGS revengence, grid 2, bioshock infinite, batman arham city, they might show up on the humble bundle later but you still have to pay the average which is mostly more than a month of PS+ on average.

I know a lot of people that just buy games because they are cheap but dont even play a fraction of them because they have no interest. on PS+ you are getting mostly popular games and the odd indie game every now and then, or when a new platform launches (like when vita and PS4 launched).


League of Legends is a AAA game. It has over 1,000 staff working on it, you think that's cheap and easy?



You're still sidetracking the origional point of all this. I'll just quote you so you can't refute it. (Stop moving the goal posts to suit your own agenda and move the argument into other facets so that you can pretend you aren't proven wrong.)

fps_d0minat0r said:


Yh I can understand why it sucks to pay to go online compulsory especially if it isnt your main system, but if you were to spend £40 on PC and/or wii U, would you get as many games as you would in a year from PS+?

And the answer was a YES. You can get many more games for the same price, end of discussion, proof was provided in prior posts, that's all folks, nothing else to see here.

ok fine, technically you are right.

I just thought at that point that whoever stands up to the debate would be talking about the same games, or at the very least games which are on the same level. to avoid mixing games, I even ignored the exclusives PS+ offered, but you took advantage of my wording.

Ofcourse, you still have the opportunity to be the first to prove the same games offered on PS+ can be had for cheaper on PC.