By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fps_d0minat0r said:


lol "AAA rated" - thats the only thing to laugh about.

AAA refers to a game with high budgets.

Ive seen games made by 2 men get high ratings, that doesnt make them AAA. That just makes them good indie games which most people apart from critics dont care about.

and registered users doesnt mean much if they dont play the game. Get me a stat where people have put more hours into humble bundle games than PS+ games and I will believe it.

And like I said, if you want these top games like borderlands 2, DmC, ME3, sleeping dogs, hitman absolution, catherine, xcom, BF3, saints row, spec ops the line, AC 3, far cry 3, MGS revengence, grid 2, bioshock infinite, batman arham city, they might show up on the humble bundle later but you still have to pay the average which is mostly more than a month of PS+ on average.

I know a lot of people that just buy games because they are cheap but dont even play a fraction of them because they have no interest. on PS+ you are getting mostly popular games and the odd indie game every now and then, or when a new platform launches (like when vita and PS4 launched).


League of Legends is a AAA game. It has over 1,000 staff working on it, you think that's cheap and easy?



You're still sidetracking the origional point of all this. I'll just quote you so you can't refute it. (Stop moving the goal posts to suit your own agenda and move the argument into other facets so that you can pretend you aren't proven wrong.)

fps_d0minat0r said:


Yh I can understand why it sucks to pay to go online compulsory especially if it isnt your main system, but if you were to spend £40 on PC and/or wii U, would you get as many games as you would in a year from PS+?

And the answer was a YES. You can get many more games for the same price, end of discussion, proof was provided in prior posts, that's all folks, nothing else to see here.




www.youtube.com/@Pemalite