By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Battlefield or ghosts?

Jaywood2010 on 02 January 2014
bananaking21 said:
JayWood2010 said:


Mustve been maris then

CoD and BF is two different playstyles.  One or the other isnt better.  Just depends on what playstyle you like.  

Though Ghosts is apparently worst than the other ones since my friends warned me not to get it after they got it.  




       

Around the Network
Pemalite on 02 January 2014

Get neither.
Get Arma instead and enjoy the plethora of mods.

Both Battlefield and Call of Duty are pretty boring, dull, repetitive iterations of prior releases with little improvement over the older releases.
Don't support the endless cycle of mediocrity!




www.youtube.com/@Pemalite

kivi95 on 02 January 2014

Easily COD between does two. EA must have the cheapest servers ever because the online is crap and the same goes to Fifa 14. Make milliobs each year yet they can't have stable servers.



http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=130023&page=1# Official Playstation Vita Thread! Come in and join!!!

J_Allard on 02 January 2014
allblue said:
J_Allard said:
CoD and BF are essentially the same in terms of controls and gunplay, BF just focuses more on big map vehicle battles and CoD focuses on close gun on gun combat on smaller maps.


Ah not really, CoD is much more of an arcade shooter than Battlefield. In battlefield, there is weight behind your movements, recoil in guns and supression effects etc. CoD is much faster paced, battlefield is not. 

CoD has different weights for every weapon class and recoil as well. Neither game has much recoil at all, BF has made sure to adapt to be more like CoD. There is a supression bonus in BF (complete with CoD style XP popup) but how often is it actually relevant? Not very in my experience.