By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Fire Emblem on NGC and Wii

Kresnik said:
_crazy_man_ said:

You should play PoR first not only for the story and characters, but you can transfer your save so your characters get a boost to their stats (helpful in RD's hard mode).


I know this may be a silly question but: how essential is Path of Radiance's story to understanding Radiant Dawn?

I've been meaning to give this series a try and since I have a Wii I thought I'd dive in with the console versions.  But PoR is ridiculously priced whereas RD is within the realm of what I'd be willing to pay to try out a new series (just about).

You could *understand* the story without playing PoR, but you won't really appreciate it nearly as much since most of the cast are returning characters from PoR.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Around the Network
Ajax said:

I love tactical rpgs and haven't played these two games yet.

What do you think of these games? And how do they compare to other console trpgs?

Has anyone played both games? How do they compare to each other?

 

The Wii game (Radiant Dawn) is a direct sequel I read, so I rather start with the GameCube version (Path of Radiance).


Do you already have these games?  If not... They are incredibly hard to find and prohibitively expensive...

that being said they are both great games, but awakening is by far the best in the series...



I've just bought Radiant Dawn.
But there are a couple games I will play first.
So I'm thinking of getting Path of Radiance too and starting that one first.
Its been a while since I've played a tactical rpg. And I'm looking forward to it.



''Hadouken!''

Nice find with RD. Where'd you find?

I'm sure PoR is more rare.



NNID: crazy_man

3DS FC: 3969 4633 0700 

 My Pokemon Trading Shop (Hidden Power Breeding)

Kresnik said:
_crazy_man_ said:

You should play PoR first not only for the story and characters, but you can transfer your save so your characters get a boost to their stats (helpful in RD's hard mode).


I know this may be a silly question but: how essential is Path of Radiance's story to understanding Radiant Dawn?

I've been meaning to give this series a try and since I have a Wii I thought I'd dive in with the console versions.  But PoR is ridiculously priced whereas RD is within the realm of what I'd be willing to pay to try out a new series (just about).

I just got Radiant Dawn, and I found no major issue. The story was well crafted to be able to jump straight in without playing the original. Indeed, I've played it, what, 10 times if not more now? You'll love it, so just go for it!

This goes for the OP as well, ofcourse.



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

Around the Network
_crazy_man_ said:
Nice find with RD. Where'd you find?

I'm sure PoR is more rare.


I found it on a dutch website for second-hand items, like ebay, for 30 euro. PoR is listed a couple times for 50 to 70 euro.



''Hadouken!''

Ajax said:
_crazy_man_ said:
Nice find with RD. Where'd you find?

I'm sure PoR is more rare.


I found it on a dutch website for second-hand items, like ebay, for 30 euro. PoR is listed a couple times for 50 to 70 euro.

Sounds about right, GC gems go for a high price.



NNID: crazy_man

3DS FC: 3969 4633 0700 

 My Pokemon Trading Shop (Hidden Power Breeding)

Bumpity bump.

I saw this thread before I went on vacation, and felt bad I didn't have a chance to give some insight on two of my favorite games. D:

FE9 / Path of Radiance is in my Top 5 list, so I'd strongly recommend trying that out first...if you can find it. FE10 / Radiant Dawn makes it pretty easy to jump right in, but some of the scenes in Part II/III of the game will hit you harder if you've played them in the proper order, or at least it was that way for me. I also thought FE9 tackled the complex themes of war and discrimination much better than FE10 did. The themes were present in both games, for sure, I just found FE9's focus to be done much better. It was the first Fire Emblem game where I actually stopped to think, "Am I the really the good guy here?"

The plot of FE9 was also much more focused than FE10, which expanded the previous game's cast and jumped around quite a bit more. This might be a matter of preference, though.

But....I do realize that FE9 is hard to find nowadays, so I certainly wouldn't say playing FE10 before FE9 is a waste of time. Both games are amazing, and FE10 does a great job of explaining the events of FE9, so you won't be lost if you play that one first. I think it's just a matter of how you'd prefer to experience those events.

Whatever you decide, I hope you enjoy those fantastic games!



NNID: Zephyr25 / PSN: Zephyr--25 / Switch: SW-4450-3680-7334

famousringo said:
MohammadBadir said:
pretty good i guess, not good as Awakening or the original GBA one, but still good.


I disagree. Awakening is better in a lot of respects — better combat flow, better characterization, better customization — but the Radiant games win in one particular aspect that trumps everything for me:

No grinding.

It keeps the challenge nice and steady and keeps decisions relevant. Also, area control feels more important in the Radiant games and damage is less bursty, both traits are more rewarding to careful planning.

The Radiant games have their problems too, of course, but the lack of grinding feels so right, that I was sad to see Awakening backpedal on it. Awakening was successful enough that I expect future FEs will all be grindy. It's a shame.


I'm the opposite. The customization and general freedom of Awakening makes all the difference. In fact, it makes Awakening a fundamentally different experience than previous FE games, because it essentially follows the same formula that makes Final Fantasy Tactics popular: start with a handful of low level units barely getting by, and end with a full, highly-cuztomized unstoppable legion. Does this come at the cost of balance? Yep. For those who think that FE's greatest strength is its ultra-refined, linear take on the genre, Awakening borders on blasphemy.

But I think Awakening combines the best aspects of two wonderful SRPG franchises into a strange, yet fascinating middle ground. FE's near-perfect interface and surprisingly accessible gameplay merged with FFT's penchant for class-based experimentation, and I can't stop playing the result. I just beat Awakening for the fifth time, to put things into perspective.



3DS Friend Code: 0645 - 5827 - 5788
WayForward Kickstarter is best kickstarter: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1236620800/shantae-half-genie-hero

Super_Boom said:
Bumpity bump.

I saw this thread before I went on vacation, and felt bad I didn't have a chance to give some insight on two of my favorite games. D:

FE9 / Path of Radiance is in my Top 5 list, so I'd strongly recommend trying that out first...if you can find it. FE10 / Radiant Dawn makes it pretty easy to jump right in, but some of the scenes in Part II/III of the game will hit you harder if you've played them in the proper order, or at least it was that way for me. I also thought FE9 tackled the complex themes of war and discrimination much better than FE10 did. The themes were present in both games, for sure, I just found FE9's focus to be done much better. It was the first Fire Emblem game where I actually stopped to think, "Am I the really the good guy here?"

The plot of FE9 was also much more focused than FE10, which expanded the previous game's cast and jumped around quite a bit more. This might be a matter of preference, though.

But....I do realize that FE9 is hard to find nowadays, so I certainly wouldn't say playing FE10 before FE9 is a waste of time. Both games are amazing, and FE10 does a great job of explaining the events of FE9, so you won't be lost if you play that one first. I think it's just a matter of how you'd prefer to experience those events.

Whatever you decide, I hope you enjoy those fantastic games!


Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this!



''Hadouken!''