By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Is PS4 CPU is better than Xbone CPU?

selnor1983 on 20 December 2013
ethomaz said:

selnor1983 said:

After playing Ryse.

Killzone has much lower res textures. Lower modeled characters. Bad animations. Less effects. and Less enemies onscreen. More than 1 scene on Ryse has around 100. Actually I think theres 5 scenes in Ryse like this. Alot of the time Killzone looks pretty bland. The city scape looking the best part. But even then the close up stuff is blurry in comparison to Ryse. A real downer after playing Ryse at leat in visual fedility.

But hey we will never agree.

PS4 multitasking takes longer to go to other programs open. Well I suppose Kinect makes it faster also. As you can say what you wan instead of using menus. And snapping is awesome. It had initial issues, but the update has made it smooth as butter.

Ryse have the worst animation I ever see in a game... it is terrible... the graphics outside the pre-rendered cutscenenes are way below what they showed in trailers... Killzone is Open World and have a lot of things happening in the scene that you have no ideia... there are parts you can see counting enemies, allies, drones and others AI controlled with way more things than Ryse... and there are more effects in the screen too.

PS4 multitasking is instantaneos... no slowdown... no time waiting... you switching between game and the app pretty fast... Xbone I didn't have the same smoothness than PS4 switching between games and apps... snapping have issues too while playing games.

I have access to both consoles in my home... did you ever played a PS4?

selnor1983 said:

PS4 exclusive way better?

Let me know when this happens.

As in 2014 nothing on PS4 exclusively looks better than Quantum Break. Im sure Halo 5 from 343i will add to that as well. So far Microsofts talk about taking processes away from GPU via other little processors seems to hold wieght. Stuff PS4 cant do. Until Sony prove they have better graphics, then we can talk. But so far its all numbers and hot air.

Again COD devs already confirmed the Xbox One development was hampered by worse SDK than PS4. In fact Ubisoft said the latest SDK from Microsoft made using the EDRAM far better and much easy to attain tiling with much better effects.

2013 already happen... and there are no axuliar processor for graphics in Xbone... please stop because you cleary didn't even understand what MS said.

In fact the only console to have real CPU for background tasks is PS4 with reserved memory too... an ARM + 256MB DDR3.

Most resources used by Shape in Xbone are Kinect related... more the Kinect uses a lot of CPU and GPU too.

The eSRAM will never be better than a single pool of 8GB fast RAM... you use it to make something better but it will limit you in others things... 1080p will be exception in Xbone due eSRAM.

I need proof. So far Ryse blew me and others away. Killzone didnt really do that. Maybe I should have played KZ first.

I fully expect 343i and Halo 5 to blow KZ away visually. And show us just how amazing a shooter with an open battlefield can look. 343i are gonna make Halo 5 look absolutely astounding. Especially considering what they achieved with Halo 4 on Xbox 360.



Around the Network
NYCrysis on 20 December 2013
selnor1983 said:

I need proof. So far Ryse blew me and others away. Killzone didnt really do that. Maybe I should have played KZ first.

I fully expect 343i and Halo 5 to blow KZ away visually. And show us just how amazing a shooter with an open battlefield can look. 343i are gonna make Halo 5 look absolutely astounding. Especially considering what they achieved with Halo 4 on Xbox 360.


First of all there is nothing on xb1 that looks and is technically as good as infamous 2nd son. The physics, particle effects, animations, open world game play, lighting all look unrivaled and destroys anything coming on xb1. Add to the fact that it's a near launch title, I don't think xb1 can catch up ever.

2nd of all regarding halo and 343i; the person who made halo as graphically as good on 360 now works for naughty dog and even before her naughty dog was unrivaled in the console graphics category good luck to Halo ONE trying to get even close to Uncharted 4.

Also quantic dream's (ps exclusive dev) animations destroy anything shown on xbox. Beyond 2 souls animations are unrivaled. QD's PS4 e3 demo is also unrivaled. Nothing compared to it on xb1.



selnor1983 on 20 December 2013
NYCrysis said:
There is nothing on xb1 that looks and is technically as good as infamous 2nd son. The physics, particle effects, open world game play, lighting all look unrivaled and destroys anything coming on xb1. Add to the fact that it's a near launch title, I don't think xb1 can catch up ever.


Infamous 2nd son looks better than Ryse. Absolutely. But Quantum Break imo looks better than Infamous.



ethomaz on 20 December 2013

selnor1983 said:

Infamous 2nd son looks better than Ryse. Absolutely. But Quantum Break imo looks better than Infamous.

I will guess you made your opinion from 5 seconds of gameplay?



NYCrysis on 20 December 2013
selnor1983 said:
NYCrysis said:
There is nothing on xb1 that looks and is technically as good as infamous 2nd son. The physics, particle effects, open world game play, lighting all look unrivaled and destroys anything coming on xb1. Add to the fact that it's a near launch title, I don't think xb1 can catch up ever.


Infamous 2nd son looks better than Ryse. Absolutely. But Quantum Break imo looks better than Infamous.


Um... no Infamous 2nd son destroys quantum break (most likely linear gameplay so not much impressive technically) and you forgot about the order 1886 which as the devs say gameplay looks even better than the e3 trailer. That too looked better than anything shown on xb1. U got anything else left to BULLSHIT say? Cause you're just a lost cause now.



Around the Network
selnor1983 on 20 December 2013
NYCrysis said:
selnor1983 said:

I need proof. So far Ryse blew me and others away. Killzone didnt really do that. Maybe I should have played KZ first.

I fully expect 343i and Halo 5 to blow KZ away visually. And show us just how amazing a shooter with an open battlefield can look. 343i are gonna make Halo 5 look absolutely astounding. Especially considering what they achieved with Halo 4 on Xbox 360.


First of all there is nothing on xb1 that looks and is technically as good as infamous 2nd son. The physics, particle effects, animations, open world game play, lighting all look unrivaled and destroys anything coming on xb1. Add to the fact that it's a near launch title, I don't think xb1 can catch up ever.

2nd of all regarding halo and 343i; the person who made halo as graphically as good on 360 now works for naughty dog and even before her naughty dog was unrivaled in the console graphics category good luck to Halo ONE trying to get even close to Uncharted 4.

Also quantic dream's (ps exclusive dev) animations destroy anything shown on xbox. Beyond 2 souls animations are unrivaled. QD's PS4 e3 demo is also unrivaled. Nothing compared to it on xb1.


I never laughed so hard. You think 343i 1 guy is responsible for Halo being amazing visually? Theres over 300 people there bro.

The reason Halo 4 and 343i are amazing visual devs is the following.

The team contains developers from Epic, Naughty Dog, Crytek, ID Software, Bungie and Bethesda Softworks. Microsoft put a team together that has many years of visual fidelity experience.

1 guy ROFL.

Quantum Break looks better than Infamous. Sorry. And we have yet to see Microsofts other amazing dveveloper they put together called Black Tusk Studio. Another studio full of people from companies like Crytek, Naughty Dog, etc.

Again I ask. Show me a game which says PS4 better graphics. Ive yet to see one.



selnor1983 on 20 December 2013
ethomaz said:

selnor1983 said:

Infamous 2nd son looks better than Ryse. Absolutely. But Quantum Break imo looks better than Infamous.

I will guess you made your opinion from 5 seconds of gameplay?


All in all we have about 30 seconds now.

And it looked unbelieveable. CGI like.



walsufnir on 20 December 2013

What is this? A benchmark? The numbers seem odd, especially as the Core i7 (without actual number) is only a little above 2 times the value as PS4 - it should easily blow it away.
Until further details on what is really measured and what it relies on everyone can make a graph and claim the opposite.



biglittlesps on 20 December 2013
selnor1983 said:
NYCrysis said:
There is nothing on xb1 that looks and is technically as good as infamous 2nd son. The physics, particle effects, open world game play, lighting all look unrivaled and destroys anything coming on xb1. Add to the fact that it's a near launch title, I don't think xb1 can catch up ever.


Infamous 2nd son looks better than Ryse. Absolutely. But Quantum Break imo looks better than Infamous.



we have not seen any real gameplay from Quantum break yet so we can't say that they are running on real Xbox one hardware.



GAMING is not about spending hours to pass/waste our time just for fun,

its a Feeling/Experience about a VIRTUAL WORLD we can never be in real, and realizing some of our dreams (also creating new ones).

So, Feel Emotions, Experience Adventure/Action, Challenge Game, Solve puzzles and Have fun.

PlayStation is about all-round "New experiences" using new IP's to provide great diversity for everyone.

Xbox is always about Online and Shooting.

Nintendo is always about Fun games and milking IP's.

ethomaz on 20 December 2013
walsufnir said:
What is this? A benchmark? The numbers seem odd, especially as the Core i7 (without actual number) is only a little above 2 times the value as PS4 - it should easily blow it away.
Until further details on what is really measured and what it relies on everyone can make a graph and claim the opposite.

It uses only one core... using all the cores of a Core i7 it will really blow away everyting.