| shikamaru317 said: Purposefully creating a parody of Sevengen's thread seems to be a violation of the baiting rule here on the forums. |
It only seems that way, it's not true.


| shikamaru317 said: Purposefully creating a parody of Sevengen's thread seems to be a violation of the baiting rule here on the forums. |
It only seems that way, it's not true.


Did you guys read Digital Foundry's Street Fighter II comparison in their magazine last month? Another victory for SNES lol.
| theprof00 said: I've seen both consoles at a friends house, got to spend a good amount of time with each, and while the SuperNES is defiitely a powerhouse, the Sega Genesis was the only machine out of the two that actaully made me feel like I was interacting with something 'cool'. We played Earthworm Jim on both systems and there's no doubt which one looked better. The SNES version. Played Super Mario World also and can't really say I was all that impressed by it. Great grafx, but not really enough going on to make it feel like the best platformer of the gen. Sorta boring after a couple days. Get the mushroom, jump on a goomba, get to the castle, repeat. Cruised around SNES demo cartridge for a bit and there simply wasn't all that much to do, to interact with. The Genesis on the other hand, the downgrade in Earthworm Jim grafx notwithstanding, truly felt cool to me. Let me explain that a little bit. Every gamer understands that better graphics won't equate to a better experience, it's the level of interaction you have with the game that matters, and that holds true with the consoles themselves. Nintendo, again, brought a monster console to the masses, a graphical beast, but did so at the cost of innovation and fun. No one buys a console anymore to just play kid games. Those that think they're having fun are fooling themselves, intentionally, and doing so in an attempt to downplay the advantages that the competitor has. |
It baffles me everytime if someone honestly thinks the sega megadrive is superior to the snes. I mean Square single handedly made the console legendary even without taking any other games into account the just the Square games are enough to put the megadrives complete library to shame
There I said it, all the advanced technology like the sega CD and 32X are worthless if they have to face the revolutionary SNES Library of games.
| Leadified said: Did you guys read Digital Foundry's Street Fighter II comparison in their magazine last month? Another victory for SNES lol. |
I know! almost 3 times the resolution! How did they pull of shifting around those extra 52 pixels! WHAT HAS SCIENCE DONE.
We'll be seeing dimishing returns next gen as to how many blocks the human eye can distinguish.
Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive
| d2wi said: Yeah right, Genesis doesn't even support four face buttons. Sega better release a patch for that, or they're gonna be dead in the water. Also, Genesis only supports 61 simultaneous colors. SNES? 256. Fucking Sega fanboys, so blind lol |
Sigh.. I already agreed that SNES had better grafx. It's one thing to argue, it's another thing to start a fight over it. Frankly I'm too mature to engage in this with you. I'm going to go play Road Rash and Mortal Kombat. Lemme know when you wanna stop playing all those kids games.


ganoncrotch said:
We'll be seeing dimishing returns next gen as to how many blocks the human eye can distinguish. |
And the MUSIC! SNES got those next gen real life insturments while Genesis still sounds like its Atari 2600 come on Sega it's 1991 get with the times.
ganoncrotch said:
We'll be seeing dimishing returns next gen as to how many blocks the human eye can distinguish. |
Between you and me I already can't distinguish it. Even the color palette that SNES boasts. Scientifically the human eye can only see 64 colors per second anyway. And Earthworm Jim? Most beautiful game I've ever seen. Gunna be hard to top that next gen, but I heard Sega's new console Dreamcast is going to be amazing.

