| Sevengen said: I've seen both consoles at a friends house, got to spend a good amount of time with each, and while the PS4 is defiitely a powerhouse of a console, the X1 was the only machine out of the two that actaully made me feel like I was interacting with something 'next-gen'. We played Battlefield on both systems and there's no doubt which one looked better. The PS4 version. Played Killzone also and can't really say I was all that impressed by it. Great graphics, but not really enough going on to make it feel like the vanguard shooter of the 8th gen. Sorta boring after a couple days. Spawn. Shoot. Die. Cruised around Sony's UI for a bit and there simply wasn't all that much to do, to interact with. The X1 on the other hand, the downgrade in Battlefields graphics notwithstanding, truly felt next-gen to me. Let me explain that a little bit. Every gamer understands that better graphics won't equate to a better experience, it's the level of interaction you have with the game that matters, and that holds true with the consoles themselves. |
The PS4 camera offers better functionality than the Kinect 2 but allows gamers to decide for themselves to get it or not.
The Kinect was best known for diverting Microsoft resources towards casual games that were bad in their own right.
The PS4 interface is much easier than the Xbox One dash as it does not overlaoded with to much shit like every other microsoft interface.
And better graphics do contribute to a better gaming experience.
This is the Game of Thrones
Where you either win
or you DIE









