By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - IGN Reviews: PS4 vs Xbox One

selnor83 said:


Xbox One already has twice the apps in the uk over PS4. At launch. It has the ability to multi task more programs/apps/games at the same time. Also you say the cable pass through is uselss. I can recieve a Skype call whilst watching Sky 1. Or a game invite wjilst watching Sky Sports F1 HD. Or I can snap in Internet Explorer and order an item whilst watching the advert I saw the item on. I can snap in a game guide whilst lost on a particular level. I can control the volume of my TV, The menu of my TV and even switch the TV on/off when my Xbox switches on and off all with Voice.

The multitasking of PS4 isnt in the same league as Xbox 1. I can stop a game, put in another game and it will leave off exactly where I was 5 days ago. It remebers. I can pin my faveourite apps to my desktop. The PS4 is a good games machine. But its multimedia functions are far less. I can also add channels to the One Guide like specific Netflix watches, Lovefilm, Skydrive photos or videos all in the One guide alongside TV channels. Its a far more cohesive and personalized entertainment experience. And one the PS4 doesnt come close to.

Wait, you can stop a game, put another game in then continue with that first game in the same spot 5 days later? Are you sure about that? From what I have read, you can only suspend and resume one game at a time. http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/691088-xbox-one/67906732



Around the Network
Hyruken said:
Panicnausia said:
Hyruken said:
Panicnausia said:
Hyruken said:
So far having now bought them both I have to say the PS4 UI is just horrific. It is so plain and boring. Sure what matters is the games but it would of been nice to have seen Sony do something a bit more flashy with it.

That's contrary to pretty much every review..The ps4 UI is outstanding, fast, responsive, everything is easy to find and just a click or two away. Well organized.


Couldn't disagree more. Firstly it is non customabale meaning my UI and yours looks exactly the same. There are no themes, no ways to change colours or move icons. It has just two rows with the first being user stuff i.e trophies, psn store and settings etc and the second being the apps and games. To say that is outstanding is just laughable considering what other devices UI's look like. It is fast and moves from one tile to the next very smooth. But when there is nothing there is that really a compliment? Take the Wii U or Xbox One UI. Those things look miles better and have a shit load more content/things to do as'well. 

In comparison to the 360, PS3, Xbox One and Wii U the PS4 interface IN MY OPINION is by far the worst looking. Like I said it is about the games but would have been nice if Sony did something different with it. Right now I would say even my Vita's UI looks more appealing.

Themes and clours have ZERO to do with useablity...and that will come later. Pretty much irrelevant. There is nothng wrong with the UI and most loved it AGAIN see reviews0 everything is easy to find and in a logical place, it also looks very nice. The drop down menu on each gam,e and area loioks outstanding. All info you need in 1 spot Agree to disagree.


Sorry bud but like you say will have to agree to disagree. In the era of smart technology i.e Phones, Tablets, advanced desktops, handheld consoles (3DS/Vita) which all enable you to custom how your home page looks then going to something that doesn't let you change anything is a step backwards. Especially when you consider you could change things and make it more personal on the PS3. The X1 is just as fast as the PS4 in regards to the interface and I can fully custom it to my liking. I honestly cannot see how you would think having less personalisation from the previous console = good because it moves faster. 

That will be on ps4 as werll so moot point.... MS is missing some things at launch like streaming, So  is sony.. Hardly a big deal, Still doesn't change the fact the UI itself is great, organized, fast. It's gotten praise for a reason. SM is cluttered and yes it is slower, there is lag and snap doesn;t work near as well as advertised, it's a waste of resources that should hae gone towards gaming.



But in the end, these two consoles are still closely identical.



Don’t follow the hype, follow the games

— 

Here a little quote I want for those to keep memorize in your head for this coming next gen.                            

 By: Suke

Who cares lol they are so close in scores



Panicnausia said:
selnor1983 said:
Blood_Tears said:
I also agree that a media device console will win this gen. People want more then just the best gaming. That's why Netflix on Sony platforms is the number 1 platform to use for that service. That's why mp3 and video streaming is getting patched in the PS4. That's why PS4 has the best browser of the 3 consoles. There is plenty of media options for that console.

The only difference in "media" is the hdmi pass through so I can watch TV or snap in TV ( with the annoying 2 audios trying to play over one another) Also, as reviews have stated, the snap feature doesn't always work consistently. (especially in a noise filled environment) It's easier just to press the button and go to where you want at times.

The whole PS4 has no media or multitasking argument is an absolute joke facilitated by MS fans in order to justify their purchase of an inferior gaming console.


Not even the same. Xbox One is a much better media box. Far more cohesive. Snap feature has never failed yet. I do want to try the PS4 browser though. On Xbox One VGChartz takes 4 secondes to load. On PS4 it must take like 1-2 seconds. The Xbox One browser is just as fast as my PC. One of the best browsers Ive ever used.

Many apps don;'t even work well with snap and it's something I can do in 1 second os PS4 with a button press. The ps4 browser is 5 times faster then x1.....google it, the x1 browser is slow. Dem facts. They browsers were tested by numerous sites.

You do know we are already using these apps ourselves in snap mode right? They work great.

What good is a browser tester?

I use the browser and the pages all load within 5 seconds. Its as fast  as my pc. So if numbers mean anything, will it make my page load in 1-2 seconds on ps4? The browser design itself is also much better. Alloowing voice controlled internet as well as gesture. I bet I could list 10 websites and visit them all with my voice much faster than a guy on ps4 with his controller. 



Around the Network
selnor1983 said:
Panicnausia said:
selnor1983 said:
Blood_Tears said:
I also agree that a media device console will win this gen. People want more then just the best gaming. That's why Netflix on Sony platforms is the number 1 platform to use for that service. That's why mp3 and video streaming is getting patched in the PS4. That's why PS4 has the best browser of the 3 consoles. There is plenty of media options for that console.

The only difference in "media" is the hdmi pass through so I can watch TV or snap in TV ( with the annoying 2 audios trying to play over one another) Also, as reviews have stated, the snap feature doesn't always work consistently. (especially in a noise filled environment) It's easier just to press the button and go to where you want at times.

The whole PS4 has no media or multitasking argument is an absolute joke facilitated by MS fans in order to justify their purchase of an inferior gaming console.


Not even the same. Xbox One is a much better media box. Far more cohesive. Snap feature has never failed yet. I do want to try the PS4 browser though. On Xbox One VGChartz takes 4 secondes to load. On PS4 it must take like 1-2 seconds. The Xbox One browser is just as fast as my PC. One of the best browsers Ive ever used.

Many apps don;'t even work well with snap and it's something I can do in 1 second os PS4 with a button press. The ps4 browser is 5 times faster then x1.....google it, the x1 browser is slow. Dem facts. They browsers were tested by numerous sites.

You do know we are already using these apps ourselves in snap mode right? They work great.

What good is a browser tester?

I use the browser and the pages all load within 5 seconds. Its as fast  as my pc. So if numbers mean anything, will it make my page load in 1-2 seconds on ps4? The browser design itself is also much better. Alloowing voice controlled internet as well as gesture. I bet I could list 10 websites and visit them all with my voice much faster than a guy on ps4 with his controller. 


You bet wrong, a quick double tap of the button would be infinitely quicker then using voice, and voice is not 100 % accurate, add in the fact PS4 browser is way faster.......

 

Google PS4 browser faster then x1....lots of sites like ars technia has detailed analysis. x1 browser is very slow.



Panicnausia said:
selnor1983 said:
Panicnausia said:
selnor1983 said:
Blood_Tears said:
I also agree that a media device console will win this gen. People want more then just the best gaming. That's why Netflix on Sony platforms is the number 1 platform to use for that service. That's why mp3 and video streaming is getting patched in the PS4. That's why PS4 has the best browser of the 3 consoles. There is plenty of media options for that console.

The only difference in "media" is the hdmi pass through so I can watch TV or snap in TV ( with the annoying 2 audios trying to play over one another) Also, as reviews have stated, the snap feature doesn't always work consistently. (especially in a noise filled environment) It's easier just to press the button and go to where you want at times.

The whole PS4 has no media or multitasking argument is an absolute joke facilitated by MS fans in order to justify their purchase of an inferior gaming console.


Not even the same. Xbox One is a much better media box. Far more cohesive. Snap feature has never failed yet. I do want to try the PS4 browser though. On Xbox One VGChartz takes 4 secondes to load. On PS4 it must take like 1-2 seconds. The Xbox One browser is just as fast as my PC. One of the best browsers Ive ever used.

Many apps don;'t even work well with snap and it's something I can do in 1 second os PS4 with a button press. The ps4 browser is 5 times faster then x1.....google it, the x1 browser is slow. Dem facts. They browsers were tested by numerous sites.

You do know we are already using these apps ourselves in snap mode right? They work great.

What good is a browser tester?

I use the browser and the pages all load within 5 seconds. Its as fast  as my pc. So if numbers mean anything, will it make my page load in 1-2 seconds on ps4? The browser design itself is also much better. Alloowing voice controlled internet as well as gesture. I bet I could list 10 websites and visit them all with my voice much faster than a guy on ps4 with his controller. 


You bet wrong, a quick double tap of the button would be infinitely quicker then using voice, and voice is not 100 % accurate, add in the fact PS4 browser is way faster.......

 

Google PS4 browser faster then x1....lots of sites like ars technia has detailed analysis. x1 browser is very slow.

So while you finish typing the URL Xbox One is already displaying the page. Ok yeah, controller is faster. I also love the way you try and say Kinect doesnt work. LOL. None of us are having problems. We use it  daily. I would never trade an Xbox One for PS4 based on media. No chance. PS4 is behind.



selnor1983 said:
Panicnausia said:
selnor1983 said:
Panicnausia said:
selnor1983 said:
Blood_Tears said:
I also agree that a media device console will win this gen. People want more then just the best gaming. That's why Netflix on Sony platforms is the number 1 platform to use for that service. That's why mp3 and video streaming is getting patched in the PS4. That's why PS4 has the best browser of the 3 consoles. There is plenty of media options for that console.

The only difference in "media" is the hdmi pass through so I can watch TV or snap in TV ( with the annoying 2 audios trying to play over one another) Also, as reviews have stated, the snap feature doesn't always work consistently. (especially in a noise filled environment) It's easier just to press the button and go to where you want at times.

The whole PS4 has no media or multitasking argument is an absolute joke facilitated by MS fans in order to justify their purchase of an inferior gaming console.


Not even the same. Xbox One is a much better media box. Far more cohesive. Snap feature has never failed yet. I do want to try the PS4 browser though. On Xbox One VGChartz takes 4 secondes to load. On PS4 it must take like 1-2 seconds. The Xbox One browser is just as fast as my PC. One of the best browsers Ive ever used.

Many apps don;'t even work well with snap and it's something I can do in 1 second os PS4 with a button press. The ps4 browser is 5 times faster then x1.....google it, the x1 browser is slow. Dem facts. They browsers were tested by numerous sites.

You do know we are already using these apps ourselves in snap mode right? They work great.

What good is a browser tester?

I use the browser and the pages all load within 5 seconds. Its as fast  as my pc. So if numbers mean anything, will it make my page load in 1-2 seconds on ps4? The browser design itself is also much better. Alloowing voice controlled internet as well as gesture. I bet I could list 10 websites and visit them all with my voice much faster than a guy on ps4 with his controller. 


You bet wrong, a quick double tap of the button would be infinitely quicker then using voice, and voice is not 100 % accurate, add in the fact PS4 browser is way faster.......

 

Google PS4 browser faster then x1....lots of sites like ars technia has detailed analysis. x1 browser is very slow.

So while you finish typing the URL Xbox One is already displaying the page. Ok yeah, controller is faster. I also love the way you try and say Kinect doesnt work. LOL. None of us are having problems. We use it  daily. I would never trade an Xbox One for PS4 based on media. No chance. PS4 is behind.

Behind that's laughable....x1 is behind int he most important areas, the things x1 does I can already do better elsewhere. 720p is behind. Every hear of bookmarks??? ROFL. Sorry, the multi-tasking on PS4 is lightning fast, and no one bus consoles for web browsing or multi-tasking. MS focused on the wrong areas.

 

Many are having issues, voce will never be as accurate as buttons.



Panicnausia said:
Hyruken said:
Panicnausia said:
Hyruken said:
Panicnausia said:
Hyruken said:
So far having now bought them both I have to say the PS4 UI is just horrific. It is so plain and boring. Sure what matters is the games but it would of been nice to have seen Sony do something a bit more flashy with it.

That's contrary to pretty much every review..The ps4 UI is outstanding, fast, responsive, everything is easy to find and just a click or two away. Well organized.


Couldn't disagree more. Firstly it is non customabale meaning my UI and yours looks exactly the same. There are no themes, no ways to change colours or move icons. It has just two rows with the first being user stuff i.e trophies, psn store and settings etc and the second being the apps and games. To say that is outstanding is just laughable considering what other devices UI's look like. It is fast and moves from one tile to the next very smooth. But when there is nothing there is that really a compliment? Take the Wii U or Xbox One UI. Those things look miles better and have a shit load more content/things to do as'well. 

In comparison to the 360, PS3, Xbox One and Wii U the PS4 interface IN MY OPINION is by far the worst looking. Like I said it is about the games but would have been nice if Sony did something different with it. Right now I would say even my Vita's UI looks more appealing.

Themes and clours have ZERO to do with useablity...and that will come later. Pretty much irrelevant. There is nothng wrong with the UI and most loved it AGAIN see reviews0 everything is easy to find and in a logical place, it also looks very nice. The drop down menu on each gam,e and area loioks outstanding. All info you need in 1 spot Agree to disagree.


Sorry bud but like you say will have to agree to disagree. In the era of smart technology i.e Phones, Tablets, advanced desktops, handheld consoles (3DS/Vita) which all enable you to custom how your home page looks then going to something that doesn't let you change anything is a step backwards. Especially when you consider you could change things and make it more personal on the PS3. The X1 is just as fast as the PS4 in regards to the interface and I can fully custom it to my liking. I honestly cannot see how you would think having less personalisation from the previous console = good because it moves faster. 

That will be on ps4 as werll so moot point.... MS is missing some things at launch like streaming, So  is sony.. Hardly a big deal, Still doesn't change the fact the UI itself is great, organized, fast. It's gotten praise for a reason. SM is cluttered and yes it is slower, there is lag and snap doesn;t work near as well as advertised, it's a waste of resources that should hae gone towards gaming.

I am talking about the UI not what features each console has....How on earth did you get to that from what I said?? 

I can tell you don't have both. I wonder if you did would you think the same. Because to say it is cluttered is pretty humerous. There is no lag, snap works fine for me. I have had no problems at all. In fact being able to go from playing a game, to watching tv, to listening to music on my phone then back to a game instantly without pressing a single button is simply amazing. So where you say it should of gone towards gaming I disagree. If I am paying £500 + on something I expect it to do more then just one thing. I expect it to be able to do many things just like I do when I buy a tablet, buy a pc, buy a car, buy a mp3 player and so on. 

I appreciate that you love the PS4. So do I, I am playing KZ (as you can see on my GT). But my point is in comparison to other devices (not just the X1) the UI although fast is pretty boring and non customable. Having 2 rows of tiles and the rest just blue screen seems a waste. Now obviously you don't agree with me, fair enough. But while both consoles have good and bad things about them if we are comparing the UI's and only that there is no comparison. The X1 wins that vs with complete ease.



Hyruken said:
Panicnausia said:
Hyruken said:
Panicnausia said:
Hyruken said:
Panicnausia said:
Hyruken said:
So far having now bought them both I have to say the PS4 UI is just horrific. It is so plain and boring. Sure what matters is the games but it would of been nice to have seen Sony do something a bit more flashy with it.

That's contrary to pretty much every review..The ps4 UI is outstanding, fast, responsive, everything is easy to find and just a click or two away. Well organized.


Couldn't disagree more. Firstly it is non customabale meaning my UI and yours looks exactly the same. There are no themes, no ways to change colours or move icons. It has just two rows with the first being user stuff i.e trophies, psn store and settings etc and the second being the apps and games. To say that is outstanding is just laughable considering what other devices UI's look like. It is fast and moves from one tile to the next very smooth. But when there is nothing there is that really a compliment? Take the Wii U or Xbox One UI. Those things look miles better and have a shit load more content/things to do as'well. 

In comparison to the 360, PS3, Xbox One and Wii U the PS4 interface IN MY OPINION is by far the worst looking. Like I said it is about the games but would have been nice if Sony did something different with it. Right now I would say even my Vita's UI looks more appealing.

Themes and clours have ZERO to do with useablity...and that will come later. Pretty much irrelevant. There is nothng wrong with the UI and most loved it AGAIN see reviews0 everything is easy to find and in a logical place, it also looks very nice. The drop down menu on each gam,e and area loioks outstanding. All info you need in 1 spot Agree to disagree.


Sorry bud but like you say will have to agree to disagree. In the era of smart technology i.e Phones, Tablets, advanced desktops, handheld consoles (3DS/Vita) which all enable you to custom how your home page looks then going to something that doesn't let you change anything is a step backwards. Especially when you consider you could change things and make it more personal on the PS3. The X1 is just as fast as the PS4 in regards to the interface and I can fully custom it to my liking. I honestly cannot see how you would think having less personalisation from the previous console = good because it moves faster. 

That will be on ps4 as werll so moot point.... MS is missing some things at launch like streaming, So  is sony.. Hardly a big deal, Still doesn't change the fact the UI itself is great, organized, fast. It's gotten praise for a reason. SM is cluttered and yes it is slower, there is lag and snap doesn;t work near as well as advertised, it's a waste of resources that should hae gone towards gaming.

I am talking about the UI not what features each console has....How on earth did you get to that from what I said?? 

I can tell you don't have both. I wonder if you did would you think the same. Because to say it is cluttered is pretty humerous. There is no lag, snap works fine for me. I have had no problems at all. In fact being able to go from playing a game, to watching tv, to listening to music on my phone then back to a game instantly without pressing a single button is simply amazing. So where you say it should of gone towards gaming I disagree. If I am paying £500 + on something I expect it to do more then just one thing. I expect it to be able to do many things just like I do when I buy a tablet, buy a pc, buy a car, buy a mp3 player and so on. 

I appreciate that you love the PS4. So do I, I am playing KZ (as you can see on my GT). But my point is in comparison to other devices (not just the X1) the UI although fast is pretty boring and non customable. Having 2 rows of tiles and the rest just blue screen seems a waste. Now obviously you don't agree with me, fair enough. But while both consoles have good and bad things about them if we are comparing the UI's and only that there is no comparison. The X1 wins that vs with complete ease.


No it doesn't many disdagree including many big gaming sites.....